DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Medved v. Doolittle, 19 N.W.2d 788.

70 citing documents.

  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
    Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 ; Geisen v. Luce, 185 Minn. 479 , ; and Denson v. McDonald, 144 Minn. 252 , , cases in which the negligence of an oncoming driver was held to constitute an intervening cause sufficient to insulate the negligence of the owner of a parked car on the highway, relied upon by p
  • Devall v. Standard Oil Co. 57 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1953
  • Devall v. Standard Oil Co. 57 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1953
    In view of that case and the opinion of this court in Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352, 357 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788, 791 ,- we do not believe that any further discussion of the doctrine of proximate cause is necessary at this time.
  • Leman v. Standard Oil Co. 57 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1953
  • Leman v. Standard Oil Co. 57 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1953
    Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 ; Geisen v. Luce, 185 Minn. 479 , .
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
    Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 ; Schnore v. Baldwin, 217 Minn. 394 , 14 N. W. (2d) 447 ; Wojtowicz v. Belden, 211 Minn. 461 , 1 N. W. (2d) 409 ; Hollander v. Dietrich, 181 Minn. 376 , .
  • Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc. 38 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1949
  • Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc. 38 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1949
    Cf. Sanders v. Gilbertson, 224 Minn. 546 , 29 N. W. (2d) 357 ; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 ; Nees v. Minneapolis St.
  • Carlson v. Fredsall 37 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1949
  • Benson v. Hoenig 37 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1949
  • Benson v. Hoenig 37 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1949
    We had occasion to consider some of the elements of proximate cause in Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 ; Seward v. Minneapolis St.
  • Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
  • Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
    Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) *161 221; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 .
  • Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n 28 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1947
  • Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n 28 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1947
    Co. 154 Minn. 1 , ; Sporna v. Kalina, 184 Minn. 89 , , 76 A. L. R. 1280; Peterson v. Fulton, 192 Minn. 360 , ; Guile v. Greenberg, 192 Minn. 548 , ; Wedel v. Johnson, 196 Minn. 170 , ; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 .
  • Seward v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 25 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1946
  • Seward v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 25 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1946
    The rule of intervening efficient cause, applied by this court in favor of defendant in Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 , is equally applicable in favor of a plaintiff when he is accused of contributory negligence.
  • Cooper v. Hoeglund 22 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1946
  • Cooper v. Hoeglund 22 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1946
    Walker v. Stecher, 219 Minn. 152 , 17 N. W. (2d) 317 ; cf. Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 .