DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Raymond v. McKenzie, 19 N.W.2d 423.

36 citing documents.

  • Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP. 298 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1980
  • Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP. 298 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1980
    Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234, 237 , -25 (1945).
  • Merz v. Oftedal 144 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1966
  • Merz v. Oftedal 144 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1966
    Julius v. Lenz, 212 Minn. 201, 203 , 3 N. W. (2d) 10, 11 ; Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234, 239 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423, 425 ; Anderson v. Tuomi, 230 Minn. 490, 505 , 42 N. W. (2d) 204, 212 , 17 A. L. R. (2d) 744; Physicians & Hospitals Supply Co. v. Johnson, 231 Minn. 548, 549 , 44 N. W. (2d) 224, 225 ; Urbanski v. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. 239 Minn. 63, 64 , 57 N. W. (2d) 686, 687 ; Tompkins v. Sandee
  • Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
  • Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
    (3 ed.) § 361; Taylor v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 165 Minn. 266 , ; Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 ; Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 246 Minn. 1 , 74 N. W. (2d) 305 .
  • Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 123 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1963
  • Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 123 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1963
    17 Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • Dyson v. Schmidt 109 N.W.2d 262 Minn. 1961
  • Dyson v. Schmidt 109 N.W.2d 262 Minn. 1961
    Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • Miracle Construction Co. v. Miller 87 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1958
  • Miracle Construction Co. v. Miller 87 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1958
    6 See, Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
  • Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
    See, Taylor v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 165 Minn. 266 , ; Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • Tompkins v. Sandeen 67 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1954
  • Tompkins v. Sandeen 67 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1954
    2 Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin 65 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1954
  • Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin 65 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1954
    Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 ; Mitchell v. Rende, 225 Minn. 145 , 30 N. W. (2d) 27 ; Associated Cinemas v. World Amusement Co. 201 Minn. 94 , ; Close v. Crossland, 47 Minn. 500 , ; Reliance Engineers Co. v. Flaherty, 211 Minn. 233 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Firs
  • State v. Bollenbach 63 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1954
  • State v. Bollenbach 63 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1954
    Respondent, in both his brief and oral argument, maintained that, since the point had not been argued in petitioner’s briefs, it had been waived, citing Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State 59 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1953
  • Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State 59 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1953
    See, Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
  • Kiebach v. Kiebach 35 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1948
  • Olson v. Mork 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
  • Olson v. Mork 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
    Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
    Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , .
  • Kiebach v. Kiebach 35 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1948
    Cf. Erickson v. Sinykin, 223 Minn. 232 , 26 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Peterson v. James, 223 Minn. 33 , 25 N. W. (2d) 300 ; see, In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Roseau County, 212 Minn. 562, 565 , 4 N. W. (2d) 783, 785 ; Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234, 239 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423, 425 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Erickson v. Mathwig 31 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1948
  • Erickson v. Mathwig 31 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1948
    White v. Mazal, 192 Minn. 522 , ; Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • Henschke v. Young 28 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1947
  • Henschke v. Young 28 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1947
    Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423 .
  • Erickson v. Sinykin 26 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1947
  • Erickson v. Sinykin 26 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1947
    entry of said judgment.” At the outset we are met with the question of what there is for us to review in view of appellant’s failure to observe the following oft-repeated rule: “Where a case is tried to the court and findings are made, the specific finding which is asserted to be without evidentiary support must be challenged in this court by a specific assignment of error.” Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234, 239 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423, 425 .
  • Peterson v. James 25 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1946
  • Peterson v. James 25 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1946
    In the late case of Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234, 239 , 19 N. W. (2d) 423, 425 , we said: “Where a case is tried to the court and findings are made, the specific finding which is asserted to be without evidentiary support must be challenged in this court by a specific assignment of error.” What has been said disposes of the case.