DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bolsinger, 21 N.W.2d 480.

120 citing documents.

  • State v. Iten 401 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Iten 401 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Gross negligence is “the want of even scant care.” State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154, 158
  • Jendro v. Honeywell, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Jendro v. Honeywell, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Kempa, d at 421 (citing State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , ).
  • State v. Connelly 389 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Connelly 389 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    In State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154, 170 , the supreme court held that “statutes employing such standards as ‘reckless’ and ‘grossly negligent’ in connection with the operation or driving of vehicles are sufficiently definite to comply with due process.” If the term “reckless” is itself sufficient to withstand due process scru
  • Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
  • Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
    State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154, 157-58 , -85 (1946).
  • Terveer v. Norling Bros. Silo Co., Inc. 365 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Terveer v. Norling Bros. Silo Co., Inc. 365 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154
  • State v. Patrick 358 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Patrick 358 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154, 169 , State v. Eich, 204 Minn. 134, 138 , 282 N.W.
  • State v. Munnell 344 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Munnell 344 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154, 166-67 , -89 (1946).
  • State v. Frost 342 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Frost 342 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1983
    § 619.18(3) (1961), which provided that homicide is manslaughter in the second degree when “committed without a design to effect death * * * (3) By an act, procurement, or culpable negligence of any person, which, according to the provisions of this chapter, does not constitute the crime of murder in the first or second degree, nor manslaughter in the first degree.” Citing State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , we defined “culpable negligence” as follows: [I]t is more than ordinary negligence.
  • State v. White 292 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1980
  • State v. White 292 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1980
    State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154
  • State v. Shatto 285 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Shatto 285 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1979
    The controlling law is set forth in State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. *493 154
  • State v. Swanson 240 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Swanson 240 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1976
    In discussing culpable negligence, we have commented : “In State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 , this court thoroughly discussed the meaning of culpable negligence.
  • State v. Kalvig 209 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Hansen 206 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Hansen 206 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1973
    In State v. Meany, 262 Minn. 491, 496 , grossly negligent operation of a vehicle is defined as conduct evincing “very great negligence or without even scant care but not with such reckless disregard of probable consequences as is equivalent to a willful and intentional wrong.” 1 See, also, State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154
  • State v. Boldra 195 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Boldra 195 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1972
    I thought I could beat that car.” The controlling law with reference to the elements of the offense is fully set forth in State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , and reviewed in the later case of State v. Brehmer, 281 Minn. 156
  • State v. Spann 182 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Spann 182 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1970
    2 In State v. Beilke, 267 Minn. 526, 534 , 127 N. W. (2d) 516, 521 , this court stated: “In State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 , this court thoroughly discussed the meaning of culpable negligence.
  • In Re Welfare of Hitzemann 161 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Brehmer 160 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Brehmer 160 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1968
    ted, provides: “Whoever operates a vehicle * * * in a grossly negligent manner and thereby causes the death of a human being not constituting murder or manslaughter is guilty of criminal negligence in the operation of a vehicle resulting in death and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or both.” *161 In State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 , gross negligence was defined as a very high degree of negligence
  • State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
  • State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
    State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , .
  • State ex rel. Kier v. Tahash 153 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1967
    State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 .
  • State v. Pratt 152 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Pratt 152 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1967
    Severity of punishment depends in part on the extent of the damage caused or on risk of death or bodily injury.” 2 State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 .
  • State v. Mathiasen 141 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Mathiasen 141 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1966
    judicial function with respect to such legislative authority are decisions to the effect that it is within the legislative province to declare that certain acts may constitute or be parts of different offenses, State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 , 162 A. L. R. 477; State v. Dineen, 10 Minn. 325 (407); that the same acts may be offenses under different statutes, State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 ; that it is not a defense to prosecution under one statute that an
  • State v. Beilke 127 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Beilke 127 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1964
    In State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 , this court thoroughly discussed the meaning of culpable negligence.
  • State v. Kuluvar 123 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Kuluvar 123 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1963
    10 State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 .
  • State v. Peterson 123 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Peterson 123 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1963
    State v. Brady, 244 Minn. 455 , 70 N. W. (2d) 449 ; State v. Bolsinger, supra [ 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 ]; State v. Kline, 168 Minn. 263 , .” While we are aware of the fact that this prosecution is directed against *82 one who happened to provide the means of travel to companions who were participants in a drinking party, and while the evidence in this record does not compare with some
  • State v. Wurdemann 120 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Wurdemann 120 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1963
    628.10; State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154, 172 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480, 491 .
  • State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
  • State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
    t manner causes a human being to be killed, under circumstances not constituting murder in the first, sec *496 ond, or third degree, or manslaughter in the first or second degree, is guilty of criminal negligence in the operation of a vehicle resulting in death.” The meanings of the terms “reckless” and “grossly negligent,” as used in this statute, are exhaustively reviewed in State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 .