Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fewell v. Tappan, 27 N.W.2d 648.

28 citing documents.

Samuel Deweese, (A13-2152), (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd., (A13-2152), (A13-2160). Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Samuel Deweese, (A13-2152), (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd., (A13-2152), (A13-2160). Minn. Ct. App. 2014
17, 2001); Pedro, d at 801 (“In a fiduciary relationship the law imposes upon them highest standards of integrity and good faith in their dealings with each other”); Evans, d at 779 (stating that “a shareholder in a closely held corporation has a fiduciary duty to deal openly, honestly and fairly with other shareholders”); see also Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 494, (defining a fiduciary relationship as one that imposes “the highest standard of integrity and good faith in their dealings with
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
See Advanced Commc’n Design, Inc., v. Follett, (ACD) (citing Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 493-94 , Venier v. Forbes, 223 Minn. 69, 74 , ).
Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 2004
Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 2004
Advanced Communication Design, -94 (Minn.2000) (citing Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 493-94 , ).
Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Professionals, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Professionals, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
545, 546 (1928)); see Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 494 , , *186 654 (1947); -81 (Minn.App.1984) (concluding that the use of surprise, bluster, and intimidation to persuade a minority shareholder to sell out violated the duty of good faith and fair dealing), review denied (Minn. June 12, 1984).
Advanced Communication Design, Inc. v. Follett 615 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 2000
Advanced Communication Design, Inc. v. Follett 615 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 2000
See Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 493-94 , (quoting Venier v. Forbes, 223 Minn. 69, 74 , ); (stating that Minn.Stat.
Berreman v. West Publishing Co. 615 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Berreman v. West Publishing Co. 615 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 494 , (Pedro II), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Miller Waste Mills, Inc. v. MacKay 520 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Miller Waste Mills, Inc. v. MacKay 520 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 494 , (shareholder in closely held corporation has fiduciary duty to deal fairly with other shareholders).
Stearns v. Plucinski 482 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Stearns v. Plucinski 482 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 497
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. 445 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. 445 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 497
Black v. NuAire, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Black v. NuAire, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 494
Harris v. Mardan Business Systems, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Harris v. Mardan Business Systems, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 493-94
Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. Dieltz 408 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. Dieltz 408 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
E.g., Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483, 497 , see also Minn. R.Evid.
Evans v. Blesi 345 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Evans v. Blesi 345 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483 , Prince v. Sonnesyn, 222 Minn. 528
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
See, Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489 , 13 N. W. (2d) 461 ; Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483 , 27 N. W. (2d) 648 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 .