DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Haney, 23 N.W.2d 369.

36 citing documents.

  • State v. Clark 722 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Clark 722 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 2006
    An accused “ ‘is entitled to a fair trial, and it is the duty of the court, and of prosecuting counsel as well, to see that he gets one.’ ” , 185 n. 6 (Minn.2002) (quoting State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 125 , ).
  • State v. DeShay 669 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2003
  • State v. DeShay 669 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2003
    ” , 185 n. 6 (Minn.2002) (quoting State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 125 , ).
  • State v. McNeil 658 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. McNeil 658 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 130
  • State v. Litzau 650 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Litzau 650 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2002
    Nevertheless, "[a]n accused, whether guilty or innocent, is entitled to a fair trial, and it is the duty of the court, and of prosecuting counsel as well, to see that he gets one.” State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 125
  • State v. Danielson 377 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Danielson 377 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124 , defense counsel made no objection to improper argument by the prosecutor.
  • Mehralian v. State 346 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Mehralian v. State 346 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 125
  • State v. Stufflebean 329 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Stufflebean 329 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1983
    See State v. White, 295 Minn. 217 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1 , State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124
  • State v. Carlson 267 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1978
  • Followed State v. Carlson 267 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1978
    At worst, the prosecutor’s argument to the jury fell far short of the impropriety which we found to be grounds for reversal in State v. Zecher, 267 Minn. 497 , and State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124
  • State v. Shotley 233 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Shotley 233 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1975
    2d 399 , 115 N. E. 2d 627 (1953); cf. State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124
  • State v. Gaulke 161 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Gaulke 161 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1968
    State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124 , 23 N. W. (2d) 369 .
  • State v. Perry 142 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Perry 142 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1966
    As stated in State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 125 , 23 N. W. (2d) 369 , 370: “ * * There must be no conduct, either by argument or by the asking of irrelevant questions, the effect of which is to inflame the prejudices or excite the passions of the jury against the accused.’ ” The order appealed from is reversed and a new trial granted.
  • State v. Turnbull 127 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Turnbull 127 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1964
    As stated in State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 125 , 23 N. W. (2d) 369 , 370: “* * * There must be no conduct, either by argument or by the asking of irrelevant questions, the effect of which is to inflame the prejudices or excite the passions of the jury against the accused.” Under these principles and in view of the circumstances described, we are of the opinio
  • State v. Jones 124 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Jones 124 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1963
    2 For recent cases involving the prejudicial effect of remarks, argument, *525 and interrogation by the prosecuting attorney, see State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124 , 23 N. W. (2d) 369 ; State v. Silvers, 230 Minn. 12 , 40 N. W. (2d) 630 ; State v. Morgan, 235 Minn. 388 , 51 N. W. (2d) 61 ; State v. Gulbrandsen, 238 Minn. 508 , 57 N. W. (2d) 419 ; State v. Cole, 240 Minn. 52 , 59 N. W. (2d) 919 .
  • State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
  • State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
    10 State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124 , 23 N. W. (2d) 369 .
  • State v. Flowers 114 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 1962
  • State v. Flowers 114 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 1962
    State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 125 , 23 N. W. (2d) 369, 370 .
  • State v. Coursolle 97 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 1959
  • State v. Coursolle 97 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 1959
    State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124 , 23 N. W. (2d) 369 .
  • State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
  • State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
    483 ; State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124 , 23 N.W.
  • State v. Morgan 51 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1952
  • State v. Morgan 51 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1952
    In State v. Haney, 222 Minn. 124, 129 , 23 N. W. (2d) 369, 372 , where similar attempts were made to inflame the passion of the jury and to call upon them to support the sheriff, we stated: “* * * Without doubt, the prejudicial argument was due to an excess of zeal rather than a determination to take unjust advantage of the accused.