Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 24 N.W.2d 244.

70 citing documents.

Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al., Minn. 2020
(“Municipalities have generally been accorded wide latitude in the exercise of police powers .
In Re Application for PERA Retirement Benefits of McGuire 756 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Application for PERA Retirement Benefits of McGuire 756 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312, 324 , -52 (1946)
C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of Chisago 742 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of Chisago 742 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312, 324 , -52 (1946)
In Re 1994 & 1995 Shoreline Improvement Contractor Licenses of Landview Landscaping, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re 1994 & 1995 Shoreline Improvement Contractor Licenses of Landview Landscaping, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
The “police power” generally refers to the power of the state and its political subdivisions “to impose such restraints upon private rights as are necessary for the general welfare.” Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312, 322
Wedemeyer v. City of Minneapolis 540 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wedemeyer v. City of Minneapolis 540 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312, 323 , In re Wilson, 32 Minn. 145, 148 , 19 N.W.
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202 , Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , rev’d on other grounds, Petition of Halberg Constr.
Pike v. Gunyou 488 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312, 331 , (overruled on other grounds).
Morris v. Perpich 421 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Morris v. Perpich 421 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312, 320-21 , -50 (1946) (despite reliance by builder, act of city engineer in granting construction permit was void because city council did not delegate such authority to city engineer).
State, City of Eden Prairie v. Liepke 403 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, City of Eden Prairie v. Liepke 403 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Barber Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 227 Minn. 77, 85 , Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312, 320
Luger v. City of Burnsville 295 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1980
Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville 295 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1980
Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville 295 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1980
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343 , The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312
Luger v. City of Burnsville 295 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1980
In The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , we upheld a municipality’s denial of a special permit for construction of a public driveway over the sidewalk as a legitimate exercise of police power because that refusal bore a “substantial relation” to one objective sought to be accomplished by the zoning restrictions: public safety.
McShane v. City of Faribault 292 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
McShane v. City of Faribault 292 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
Paul, 304 Minn. 438 , Connor v. Township of Chanhassen, 249 Minn. 205 , Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312
Johnson v. City of Plymouth 263 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1978
Johnson v. City of Plymouth 263 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1978
*608 As a final matter, our decision in The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , was the subject of much discussion on this appeal and warrants brief comment.
Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of Itasca 258 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1977
Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of Itasca 258 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1977
See, Board of Education v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202, 211 , Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , Berger, Estoppel Against the Government, 21 U. of Chi.L.Rev.
Local Government Information Systems v. Village of New Hope 248 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1976
Local Government Information Systems v. Village of New Hope 248 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1976
State, by Burnquist, v. Marcks, 228 Minn. 129 , Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312
Tebben v. Minnesota Highway Patrolmen's Retirement Ass'n 193 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1972
Tebben v. Minnesota Highway Patrolmen's Retirement Ass'n 193 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1972
See, e. g., Board of Education v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202 , The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312
BENSON HOTEL CORPORATION v. City of Minneapolis 187 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1971
BENSON HOTEL CORPORATION v. City of Minneapolis 187 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1971
Minneapolis City Charter, c. 8, § 1, provides: “The City Council shall have the care, supervision and control of all highways, streets, alleys, public squares and grounds within the limits of the city * * *.” As we noted in The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312, 324 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244, 252 , charter provisions of this kind vest in municipalities extensive police power.
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 178 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1970
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 178 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1970
W. H. Barber Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 227 Minn. 77 , 34 N. W. (2d) 710 ; Newcomb v. Teske, 225 Minn. 223 , 30 N. W. (2d) 354 ; The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244 .
Zylka v. City of Crystal 167 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1969
Zylka v. City of Crystal 167 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1969
Contra, *198 Kotrich v. County of Du Page, supra; The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244 ; 4M Club, Inc. v. Andrews, 11 App. Div. (2d) 720, 204 N. Y. S. (2d) 610; 1 Davis, Administrative Law, § 2.09; Goldston and Scheuer, Zoning of Planned Residential Developments, 73 Harv.
State, Department of Employment Security v. Zroker 159 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1968
State, Department of Employment Security v. Zroker 159 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1968
Board of Education v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202 , 34 N. W. (2d) 689 ; The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244 .
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 128 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1964
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 128 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1964
3 62 C. J. S., Municipal Corporations, § 132; The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244 ; State ex rel.
Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of Bloomington 125 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1964
Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of Bloomington 125 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1964
The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244 ; City of St.
Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
See, In re Wilson, 32 Minn. 145, 148 , ; Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church v. City of Detroit Lakes, 221 Minn. 55, 58 , 21 N. W. (2d) 203, 205 ; The Alexander Co. v. City of Owa-tonna, 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244 ; State ex rel.
Borchert v. Village of North Oaks 117 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1962
Borchert v. Village of North Oaks 117 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1962
1 See, also, Severkson v. City of Minneapolis, 204 Minn. 388 , , 120 A. L. R. 944; The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244 .
Mattill v. Public Employees Retirement Board 112 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1961
Mattill v. Public Employees Retirement Board 112 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1961
4 See, The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. (2d) 244 .