DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Maust v. Maust, 23 N.W.2d 537.

49 citing documents.

  • William Jepsen, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Eric Parker Dean, Minn. 2021
    Although we have said that we construe statutes in abrogation of the common law “strictly,” we do not construe them “so narrowly ” that “we disregard the Legislature’s intent.” ().
  • Minn. 2019
    Further, even if it were appropriate to apply the canon before determining if the statute is ambiguous, it is well-established that “ ‘strict construction should not be pushed to the extent of nullifying the beneficial purpose of the statute, or lessening the scope plainly intended to be given thereto.’ ” Swanson, d at 280 n.14 ().
  • Swanson v. Brewster 784 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2010
  • Swanson v. Brewster 784 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2010
    at 327-28 , it is also true that we should not so narrowly construe statutes that we disregard the Legislature’s intent, Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135, 139
  • Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202, 205 , Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135, 137-38
  • Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen 331 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1983
  • Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen 331 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1983
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135, 140
  • Wos v. Wos 191 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
  • Wos v. Wos 191 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
    We noted in Longbotham v. Longbotham, 119 Minn. 139, 143 , that the practice of continuing undivided interests has the tendency to continue “strife and litigation between the divorced parties.” To the same effect, see Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , Johnson v. Johnson, 284 Minn. 181
  • Ekberg v. Thein 191 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1971
  • Ekberg v. Thein 191 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1971
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135
  • Hartman v. Blanding's Inc. 181 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1970
  • Hartman v. Blanding's Inc. 181 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1970
    Heise v. The J. R. Clark Co. 245 Minn. 179 , 71 N. W. (2d) 818 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , .
  • Johnson v. Johnson 169 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1969
  • Johnson v. Johnson 169 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1969
    As we observed in Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135, 138 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 , 539: “* * * The bitterness and animosity existing between the parties to this action, as clearly demonstrated by the record, indicates with certainty that any decree which would make plaintiff and defendant joint owners of the property here involved would lead to further strife and litigatio
  • Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
  • Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 .
  • Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
  • Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
    Rather, our duty is fully performed when we have fairly considered all the evidence and from it have determined that it reasonably supports the findings.” Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135, 137 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537, 539 .
  • Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 153 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
  • Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 153 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
    Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199, 203 , ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 .
  • CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. Tapper 143 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1966
  • CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. Tapper 143 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1966
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Board of Education v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202 , 34 N. W. (2d) 689 .
  • Kappers v. Blaul 142 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1966
  • Kappers v. Blaul 142 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1966
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 .
  • Liebsch v. Abbott 122 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1963
  • Walters v. Common School Districts Nos. 2550, 2551, 2583, & 2585 121 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1963
  • Walters v. Common School Districts Nos. 2550, 2551, 2583, & 2585 121 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1963
    Gaertner v. Rees, 259 Minn. 299 , 107 N. W. (2d) 365 ; Hynan v. First Trust Co. 258 Minn. 118 , 103 N. W. (2d) 209 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; McLellan v. Stevens, 176 Minn. 419 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Gaertner v. Rees 107 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1961
  • Gaertner v. Rees 107 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1961
    This court in the recent case of Hynan v. First Trust Co. 258 Minn. 118, 124 , 103 N. W. (2d) 209, 213 , said: “* * * When an action is tried by a court without a jury its findings are entitled to the same weight as the verdict of a jury and will not be reversed on appeal unless they are manifestly contrary to the evidence.” See, also, Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; State v. Adams, 251 Minn. 521 , 89 N. W. (2d) 661 .
  • Hynan v. FIRST TRUST COMPANY OF ST. PAUL 103 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1960
  • Hynan v. FIRST TRUST COMPANY OF ST. PAUL 103 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1960
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135, 137 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537, 539 .
  • G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
  • G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
    Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , ; Hoverson v. Hoverson, 216 Minn. 237 , 12 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
  • Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
    Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , ; Hoverson v. Hoverson, 216 Minn. 237 , 12 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • State v. Bentley 71 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1955
  • State v. Bentley 71 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1955
    As this court said in Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135, 137 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537, 539 , it is not “within our province, to go into an extended discussion of the evidence to prove or demonstrate the correctness of the -findings of the trial court.
  • Marquardt v. Stark 58 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1953
  • Marquardt v. Stark 58 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1953
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; gervice & gecurity, Inc. v. St.
  • Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
  • Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Service & Security, Inc. v. St.
  • Rivera v. Mandsager 36 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1949
  • Rivera v. Mandsager 36 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1949
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Cooper v. Hoeglund, 221 Minn. 446 , 22 N. W. (2d) 450 ; Holmes v. Conter, 212 Minn. 394 , 4 N. W. (2d) 106 ; Magnuson v. Burgess, 124 Minn. 374 , , In many cases, this court has said that on such appeal the evidence will be viewed in the light most favorable to the party prevailing i
  • Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
  • Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
    Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Longbotham v. Longbotham, 119 Minn. 139 , .
  • Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. Sand 34 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1948
  • Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. Sand 34 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1948
    Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Meiners v. Kennedy, 221 Minn. 6 , 20 N. W. (2d) 539 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.