Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 23 N.W.2d 362.

75 citing documents.

Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank of Warren 76 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1956
Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank of Warren 76 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1956
In Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362, 366 , 166 A. L. R. 435, this court adopted the rule in Restatement, Contracts, § 197, which provides: “Where, acting under an oral contract for the transfer of an interest in land, the purchaser with the assent of the vendor * -X- * -X- -X- “(b) takes possession thereof or retains a possession the
Alsdorf v. Svoboda 57 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1953
Alsdorf v. Svoboda 57 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1953
In re Estate of LeBorius, 224 Minn. 203 , 28 N. W. (2d) 157 ; Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A. L. R. 435; Seitz v. Sitze, supra; Holter v. Laugen, 157 Minn. 90 , .
Burke v. Fine 51 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1952
Ehmke v. Hill 51 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1952
Ehmke v. Hill 51 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1952
Appellants, in reliance upon Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A.L.R.
Burke v. Fine 51 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1952
some cases has been explained by the extreme hardship which would result if the statute were applied (Brown v. Hoag, 35 Minn. 373 , ; Slingerland v. Slingerland, 39 Minn. 197 , ); while in others the court has felt that the policy behind the statute was adequately protected if acts of performance unequivocally referable to the contract were shown (Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. [2d] 362, 166 A. L. R. 435).
Minar v. Skoog 50 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1951
Minar v. Skoog 50 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1951
3 Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A. L. R. 435; Suhre v. Busch, 343 Mo.
Johnson v. Fitzke 48 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1951
Johnson v. Fitzke 48 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1951
Co. 97 Utah 335 , 93 P. (2d) 450 , and Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A. L. R. 435.
Mickelson v. Kernkamp 42 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1950
Burman v. Burman 40 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1950
Burman v. Burman 40 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1950
In Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 145 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362, 365 , 166 A. L. R. 435, this court said: “* *- * Conflicts in evidence are not to be resolved on appeal, and the trial court’s findings will not be disturbed unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.
Enderson v. Kelehan 32 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1948
Enderson v. Kelehan 32 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1948
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A. L. R. 435.
LeBorius v. Reynolds 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
In Re Estate of Leborius 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
LeBorius v. Reynolds 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
between plaintiff and the deceased Louise Frank LeBorius by the terms of which Louise Frank LeBorius was or became or continued to be obligated to bequeath by will to the plaintiff a life interest in the property hereinabove describe!!; * * Under the rule that the trial court’s findings will not be disturbed unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence (Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. [2d] 362, *215 166 A. L. R. 435; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
In Re Estate of Leborius 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
Under the rule that the trial court's findings will not be disturbed unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence (Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N.W.
Holste v. Baker 26 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 1947
Holste v. Baker 26 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 1947
In Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , *325 we definitely committed ourselves to the rule as found in subd.
Prince v. Sonnesyn 25 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1946
Prince v. Sonnesyn 25 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1946
In one of our late cases (Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. [2d] 362, 363), we said: *536 “Conflicts in evidence are not to be resolved on appeal, and the trial court’s findings will not be disturbed unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.” Sonnesyn claims that plaintiffs here are claiming the benefits of the contract for the forming of the