DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Village of Newport v. Taylor, 30 N.W.2d 588.

86 citing documents.

  • Phillips v. Blowers 161 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1968
  • Phillips v. Blowers 161 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1968
    740, 742 , must be “clear, positive, and unequivocal.” We said in Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299, 303 , 30 N.W.
  • Rein v. Town of Spring Lake 145 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
  • Rein v. Town of Spring Lake 145 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
    Appellant cites Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , , and other cases [1] as controlling.
  • Rein v. Town of Spring Lake 145 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
  • Rein v. Town of Spring Lake 145 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
    Appellant cites Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 , and other cases 1 *83 as controlling.
  • Miller v. Martin 106 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1960
  • Miller v. Martin 106 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1960
    541.02; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson, 232 Minn. 152 , 44 N. W. (2d) 775 ; Engquist v. Wirtjes, 243 Minn. 502 , 68 N. W. (2d) 412 .
  • Stein v. Town Board 99 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1959
  • In Re Stein to Register Title to Land 256 Minn. 485 Minn. 1959
  • In Re Stein to Register Title to Land 256 Minn. 485 Minn. 1959
    Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N.W.
  • Stein v. Town Board 99 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1959
    Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 .
  • Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
  • Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
    Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; St.
  • City of Fergus Falls v. Whitlock 77 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1956
  • City of Fergus Falls v. Whitlock 77 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1956
    If this contention is predicated upon the claim that Sherman Street has been abandoned by the city, the case of Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299, 305 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588, 592 , is sufficient answer, for it was there held: “* * * An intention to abandon is not established by negative or equivocal acts.
  • Gifford v. Vore 72 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1955
  • Gifford v. Vore 72 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1955
    Fishman v. Nielsen, supra; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Engquist v. Wirtjes 68 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1955
  • Engquist v. Wirtjes 68 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1955
    3 Fishman v. Nielsen, 237 Minn. 1 , 53 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Fishman v. Nielsen 53 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1952
  • Fishman v. Nielsen 53 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1952
    Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , and note 2, 30 N. W. (2d) 588 , and note 1.
  • Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson 44 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
  • Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson 44 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
    Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; Simpson v. Sheridan, 231 Minn. 118 , 42 N. W. (2d) 402 .
  • Simpson v. Sheridan 42 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1950
  • Simpson v. Sheridan 42 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1950
    In Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299, 303 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588, 591 , we said: * * adverse possession may be established only by clear and positive proof based on a strict construction of the evidence, without resort to any inference or presumption in favor of the disseizor, but with the indulgence of every presumption against him.
  • Bryant v. Gustafson 40 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1950
  • Bryant v. Gustafson 40 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1950
    (See, Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. [2d] 588, and cases there cited.)
  • Alstad v. Boyer 37 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1949
  • Alstad v. Boyer 37 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1949
    Defendant asserts, however, that under Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 , adverse possession must be established by clear and positive proof without resort to any inference or presumption in favor of the disseizor.
  • State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Marcks 36 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1949
  • State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Marcks 36 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1949
    See, Pierro v. City of Minneapolis, 139 Minn. 394 , ; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 .
  • Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
  • Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
    Plaintiffs in effect contend that of the five essential elements of' adverse possession, that it must be hostile, open, actual, continuous, and exclusive (Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299, 303 , 30 N. W. [2d] 588, 591), two thereof — that it must be hostile and continuous — are absent here.
  • Mitchell v. City of St. Paul 31 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1948
  • Mitchell v. City of St. Paul 31 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1948
    It might be said that whatever rights defendants acquired under the condemnation proceedings and the deed were not lost by nonusage or abandonment, under the recent decision of Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 , where authorities are cited.