Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lappinen v. Union Ore Co., 29 N.W.2d 8.

61 citing documents.

Higgins v. Guerin 245 P.2d 956 Ariz. 1952
Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
As we have repeatedly pointed out — as recently as in Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 224 Minn. 395, 411-412 , 29 N. W. (2d) 8 , 19—our so-called appeal is in the nature of a writ of error, under which our function is not to try a case de novo, but to determine whether error was committed in the trial court.
In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
Olson v. Mork 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
Olson v. Mork 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
See, Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 224 Minn. 395 , 29 N. W. (2d) 8 .
In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
See, Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 224 Minn. 395 , .
State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service Board 32 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1948
State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service Board 32 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1948
Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 224 Minn. 395 , 29 N. W. (2d) 8 ; United States v. Goodwin, 11 U. S. (Cranch) 108 , 3 L. ed. 284; Commr.
Hanson v. Hayes 29 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 1947
Hanson v. Hayes 29 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 1947
In Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 224 Minn. 395 , 29 N. W. (2d) 8 , we reiterated the rule of the Sheldon case so far as it related to the rule that the schedule of compensation for specific injuries controls and excludes other allowances, except where there is other physical injury which otherwise would not be compensated.