Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland, 25 N.W.2d 474.
- Izaak Walton League of America Endowment, Inc. v. State 252 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1977
-
Izaak Walton League of America Endowment, Inc. v. State
252 N.W.2d 852
Minn. 1977
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , , 174 A. L. R. 544 (1946); Arens v. Village of Rogers; 240 Minn. 386 , appeal dismissed, 347 U. S. 949 , 74 S. Ct. 680 , 98 L. ed. 1096 (1954).
- Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. Hanson 178 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1970
-
Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. Hanson
178 N.W.2d 846
Minn. 1970
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544; County Bd.
- Arizona Fence Contractors Ass'n v. City of Phoenix Advisory & Appeals Board 436 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
-
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority
151 N.W.2d 584
Minn. 1967
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , *83 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544.
- Dakota County Members of the Bar v. Dakota County Officials 150 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1967
-
Dakota County Members of the Bar v. Dakota County Officials
150 N.W.2d 863
Minn. 1967
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544.
- Slezak v. Ousdigian 110 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1961
-
Slezak v. Ousdigian
110 N.W.2d 1
Minn. 1961
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544; 67 C. J. S., Parties, § 13(3); 39 Am.
- Connor v. Township of Chanhassen 81 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1957
-
Connor v. Township of Chanhassen
81 N.W.2d 789
Minn. 1957
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544.
- Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 68 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1955
-
Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
68 N.W.2d 870
Minn. 1955
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544; State ex rel.
- Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
-
Arens v. Village of Rogers
61 N.W.2d 508
Minn. 1953
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544, and (2) that a legal standing is not present by reason of their being the former holders of the last private liquor licenses issued in the village of Eogers because liquor licensees have no vested right to renewal of their licenses and their status upon expiration of their licen
- Minneapolis Federation of Men Teachers v. Board of Education 56 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1952
-
Minneapolis Federation of Men Teachers v. Board of Education
56 N.W.2d 203
Minn. 1952
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544; 16 Am.
- Harrington v. Fairchild 51 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1952
-
Harrington v. Fairchild
51 N.W.2d 71
Minn. 1952
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544, we said that complainant must, as a minimum requirement, possess a bona fide legal interest which has been, or with respect to the ripening seeds of a controversy is about to be, affected in a prejudicial manner.
- Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
-
Hassler v. Engberg
48 N.W.2d 343
Minn. 1951
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544; County Board of Education v. Borgen, 192 Minn. 512 , ; Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , .
- Stark v. Rodriquez 37 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1949
-
Stark v. Rodriquez
37 N.W.2d 812
Minn. 1949
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 93 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474, 477 , where we said: “What is a protectible legal interest may be illustrated.
- State v. Meyer 37 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1949
-
State v. Meyer
37 N.W.2d 3
Minn. 1949
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544.
- Lee v. Delmont 36 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1949
-
Lee v. Delmont
36 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 1949
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 94 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474, 478 , 174 A. L. R. 544; State ex rel.