Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northwestern National Bank v. Balch, 31 N.W.2d 20.

18 citing documents.

  • In re the Estate of: Edward D. Kane a/k/a Edward Donald Kane, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    Conversely, intention which the testator may have had, but did not express in his will, cannot be considered.” 225 Minn. 443, 448–49, (citations omitted).
  • In Re Ruth Easton Fund 680 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    Just as the court lacks power to remake a will, it also lacks the power to remake a trust.” Northwestern Nat’l Bank of Minneapolis v. Balch (In re Cosgrave’s Will), 225 Minn. 443, 466
  • In Re the Estate of Lund 633 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Cf. In re Cosgrave’s Will, 225 Minn. 443, 458 , (finding no demonstrative legacy because there was no specified sum of money, the gift was “not to be paid at all events,” and only to be paid out one source).
  • In Re Estate of Kerr 520 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    at 484 ; see In re Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443, 449 , (intention which testator did not express in his will cannot be considered).
  • In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright 359 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In re Cosgrave’s Will, 225 Minn. 443, 449
  • Matter of Wiedemann 358 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    In re Cosgrave's Will, 225 Minn. 443, 449
  • In Re the Trusts Created in & by the Last Will & Testament of HARTMAN 347 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1984
    * * * Conversely, intention which the testator may have had, but did not express in his will, cannot be considered.” In re Cosgrave’s Will, 225 Minn. 443, 448-49
  • Matter of Will of Kelly 266 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1978
    See, In re Trust under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443
  • In Matter of Campbell's Trusts 258 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1977
    In re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443
  • In Re Trust Under Agreement With Nash 122 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1963
    5 In re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443, 459 , 31 N. W. (2d) 20, 30 , 1 A. L. R. (2d) 175; accord, Orme v. The Northern Trust Co. 25 Ill.
  • In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Whelan 263 Minn. 476 Minn. 1962
  • First National Bank v. Stewart 116 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1962
  • In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Whelan 263 Minn. 476 Minn. 1962
    We think the issue in this case is controlled by our decision in In re Trust under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443 , 31 N.W.
  • First National Bank v. Stewart 116 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1962
    We think the issue in this case is controlled by our decision in In re Trust under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443 , 31 N. W. (2d) 20 , 1 A. L. R. (2d) 175.
  • In Re Petition of Parks 114 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1962
    On factors ■ considered in determining meaning of a word, see In re Trust under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443, 454 , 31 N. W. (2d) 20, 28 , 1 A. L. R. (2d) 175, 184.
  • In Re Trust Created by Will of Tuthill 247 Minn. 122 Minn. 1956
    977 ; In re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443 , 31 N.W.
  • Bickford v. Wicklow 76 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1956
    See, also, In re Trusts Created by Butler, 223 Minn. 196 , 26 N. W. (2d) 204 , 172 A. L. R. 977; In re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443 , 31 N. W. (2d) 20 , 1 A. L. R. (2d) 175; In re Trusteeship Created by Fiske, 242 Minn. 452 , 65 N. W. (2d) 906 .
  • In Re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave 31 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1948