Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 28 N.W.2d 760.

30 citing documents.

Patti Amanda’s Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that if city charter language “is unambiguous and clearly expressive of a de finite meaning or intent, there is no room for construction, and the meaning or intent so expressed must govern”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Neil Douglas Selseth, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
( “We have previously said that ‘[t]he word ‘notwithstanding’ is the equivalent of the words ‘in spite of.’’”) (quoting Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen , ).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Gov’tal Research Bu reau, Inc. v. Borgen , (“As a remedial statute, i t is to be construed liberally for the advancement of the remedy.”).
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 883 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 883 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2016
And we need not rely on our case law when a controlling statute resolves the issue before us. 10 the equivalent of the words ‘in spite of.’ ” Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313, 322
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 644 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 644 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Governmental Research Bureau v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313, 320
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 615 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2000
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 615 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2000
see generally Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313, 323
Miller v. Colortyme, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1994
Miller v. Colortyme, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1994
Governmental Research Bureau v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313
Rasmussen v. Glass 498 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hall v. City of Champlin 463 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1990
Hall v. City of Champlin 463 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1990
Governmental Research Bureau v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313, 322
Love v. Amsler 441 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Love v. Amsler 441 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Because the Act is remedial it should be “[c]on-strued liberally for advancement of the remedy.” Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313, 323
Bouza v. Gallagher 416 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bouza v. Gallagher 416 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313, 322
Ashenbrenner v. City of East Grand Forks 102 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1960
Ashenbrenner v. City of East Grand Forks 102 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1960
Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313 , 28 N. W. (2d) 760 ; City of Minneapolis v. Village of Brooklyn Center, 223 Minn. 498 , 27 N. W. (2d) 563 ; Zochrison v. Redemption Gold Corp. 200 Minn. 383 , ; Tomasko v. Cotton, 200 Minn. 69 , .
Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc. 93 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1958
Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc. 93 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1958
of Taxation, 228 Minn. 345 , 37 N. W. (2d) 711 ; Paul v. Faricy, 228 Minn. 264 , 37 N. W. (2d) 427 ; Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313 , 28 N. W. (2d) 760 ; Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
In Re Trust Created by Phillips 90 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1958
In Re Trust Created by Phillips 90 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1958
of Taxation, 228 Minn. 345 , 37 N. W. (2d) 711 ; Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313 , 28 N. W. (2d) 760 .
Stabs v. City of Tower 40 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1949
Stabs v. City of Tower 40 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1949
In so doing, we should consider the “contemporaneous legislative history” (§ 645.16 [7]), “legislative and administrative interpretations of the statute” (§ 645.16 [8]), the mischief to be remedied and the objects sought to be accomplished by the statute (§ 645.16 [3,4]; Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313 , 28 N. W. [2d] 760), other statutes relating to the same subject matter — the regulation and control of the sale and use of intoxicating liquors — so far as they shed
Ramaley v. City of St. Paul 33 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1948
Ramaley v. City of St. Paul 33 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1948
Jur., Municipal Corporations, § 323; see, Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313 , 28 N. W. (2d) 760 ; M. S. A. 645.17(3).
State Ex Rel. County of Hennepin v. Brandt 31 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1948
State Ex Rel. County of Hennepin v. Brandt 31 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1948
In Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen, 224 Minn. 313, 319 , 28 N. W. (2d) 760, 764 , this' court stated: “The better rule, and the one we adopt, is that statutes imposing taxes and providing means for the collection of the same should be construed strictly insofar as they may operate to deprive the citizen of his property by summary proceedings or to impose penalties or