DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Anderson, 28 N.W.2d 66.

28 citing documents.

  • Wadena v. Bush 232 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1975
  • Wadena v. Bush 232 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1975
    See, Goeden v. Thompson, 289 Minn. 293 , Seivert v. Bass, 288 Minn. 457 , Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216
  • Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
  • Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
    Mr. Chief Justice Loring, speaking for the court in Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216, 219 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66, 68 , said: “* * * Both drivers were familiar with the intersection and knew that it was protected against traffic on the town road by a stop sign.
  • Kennedy v. Caudell 151 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1967
  • Kennedy v. Caudell 151 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1967
    Bocchi v. Karnstedt, 238 Minn. 257 , 56 N. W. (2d) 628 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Lowery v. Clouse (8 Cir.) 348 F. (2d) 252; Tollefson v. Ehlers, 252 Minn. 370 , 90 N. W. (2d) 205 .
  • Pogalz v. Kenna 126 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1964
  • Pogalz v. Kenna 126 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1964
    Plaintiffs cite Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; and Satter v. Turner, 251 Minn. 1 , 86 N. W. (2d) 85 , 66 A. L. R. (2d) 1178, as controlling.
  • Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
  • Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
    Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 ; Bocchi v. Karnstedt, 238 Minn. 257 , 56 N. W. (2d) 628 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
  • Ballweber v. Kleist 78 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1956
  • Ballweber v. Kleist 78 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1956
    1 Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 (through street); Salters v. Uhlir, 208 Minn. 66
  • Mottinger v. Halfman 76 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1956
  • Mottinger v. Halfman 76 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1956
    Bocchi v. Karnstedt, 238 Minn. 257 , 56 N. W. (2d) 628 ; Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, supra; see, Svenson v. *119 Vondrak, 200 Wis.
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
    Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71, 78 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459, 463 ; Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216, 218 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66, 68 .
  • Neal v. Neal 56 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1953
  • Neal v. Neal 56 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1953
    If so, the driver should act accordingly and take appropriate precautions.” *296 Appellant contends that Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 , is controlling in his favor.
  • Rod v. Jeffords 56 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1953
  • Bocchi v. Karnstedt 56 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
  • Bocchi v. Karnstedt 56 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
    As we said in Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216, 218 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 , 68: “* * * By doing so, he violated his duty to stop, look for, and yield the right of way to cars within the zone where they constituted an immediate hazard.” Plaintiff has not challenged the correctness of the trial court’s ruling in granting defendant Bartlett judgment notwithstanding *261
  • Rod v. Jeffords 56 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1953
    Zickrick v. Strathern, 211 Minn. 329 , 1 N. W. (2d) 134 ; Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 .
  • Norton v. Nelson 53 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1952
  • Distinguished Norton v. Nelson 53 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1952
    The case of Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 , relied upon by appellant is distinguishable from the case now before us. There, plaintiff’s driver was proceeding along an arterial highway at a speed which was prima facie lawful at the time and under the road and weather conditions prevailing.
  • Bohnen v. Gorr 47 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1951
  • Bohnen v. Gorr 47 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1951
    3 In Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216, 218 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66, 68 , we quoted with approval the following language of the Wisconsin court in Svenson v. Vondrak, 200 Wis.
  • Lee v. Molter 35 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1949
  • Lee v. Molter 35 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1949
    Cf. Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Wojtowicz v. Belden, 211 Minn. 461 , 1 N. W. (2d) 409 ; Luce v. G. N. Ry.