DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, Inc., 31 N.W.2d 332.

54 citing documents.

  • Wise v. Stonebridge Cmtys., LLC 927 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • Wise v. Stonebridge Cmtys., LLC 927 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    225 Minn. 496 , , 334 (1948).
  • Karla Kay Edenloff v. Maxistorage, LLC, a/k/a Maxistorage 1801, LLC, Maxistorage 1807, LLC and Maxistorage 1711, LLC d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Karla Kay Edenloff v. Maxistorage, LLC, a/k/a Maxistorage 1801, LLC, Maxistorage 1807, LLC and Maxistorage 1711, LLC d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    of Minn., Inc., 225 Minn. 496, 499, (concluding that evidence supported verdict for tenant where landlord retained control of common stairway and did not inspect steps for faulty condition).
  • White v. Many Rivers West Ltd. Partnership 797 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
  • White v. Many Rivers West Ltd. Partnership 797 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    of Minn., Inc., 225 Minn. 496, 499 , (holding that evidence supported verdict for tenant where landlord retained control of common stairway and did not inspect steps for faulty condition).
  • DOMAGALA v. Rolland 787 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • DOMAGALA v. Rolland 787 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    Schlieman v. Gannett Minn. Broad., Inc., (“In general a jury charge should affirmatively set forth the law that applies and avoid the express exclusion of *671 a nonapplicable principle of law.” (citing Nubbe v. Hardy Cont’l Hotel Sys., 225 Minn. 496, 502-03 , )).
  • Gradjelick v. Hance 646 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2002
  • Gradjelick v. Hance 646 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2002
    of Minnesota, Inc., 225 Minn. 496, 499 , (emphasis in original).
  • Schlieman v. Gannett Minnesota Broadcasting, Inc. 637 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Schlieman v. Gannett Minnesota Broadcasting, Inc. 637 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Nubbe v. Hardy Cont’l Hotel Sys., 225 Minn. 496, 502-03
  • Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
  • Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
    In so doing, he relies on Hagen v. Snow, 244 Minn. 101 , and Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, 225 Minn. 496
  • Lillemoen v. Gregorich 256 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1977
  • Lillemoen v. Gregorich 256 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1977
    See, e. g., Nubhe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496
  • County of Hennepin v. Shasky 182 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1970
  • County of Hennepin v. Shasky 182 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1970
    Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, Inc. (1948) 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 ; Heitman v. City of Lake City, 225 Minn. 117 , 30 N. W. (2d) 18 .” While such language might be proper argument to a jury, refusal of this instruction was within the discretion of the trial court and was not prejudicial error.
  • McCarty v. Village of Nashwauk 164 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1969
  • McCarty v. Village of Nashwauk 164 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1969
    We agree with the trial judge that the following statement of this court appearing in Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496, 497 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332, 333 , is applicable to the present situation: “Evidence of the absence of prior accidents resulting from the same physical defect or inanimate cause, under substantially similar circumstances, is admissible to prove that such defect or cause was not dangerous or likely to cause such accidents
  • Sanders v. Boulevard Del., Inc. 152 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1967
  • Sanders v. Boulevard Del., Inc. 152 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1967
    In Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 , plaintiff tenant sued defendant landlord for injuries sustained when she fell down defendant’s allegedly defective stairway.
  • Geislinger v. Village of Watkins 130 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1964
  • Geislinger v. Village of Watkins 130 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1964
    With respect to the stairway, over which defendant retained control, its responsibilities and obligations to its tenant and the latter’s invitees are well defined in Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496, 499 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332, 334 , as follows: “* * * A landlord who retains possession and control of stairways and similar building facilities for the common use of the tenants * * * although not an insurer of the safety of these facilities, owes a duty of exercising ordinary car
  • Boraas v. Carlson 127 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1964
  • Boraas v. Carlson 127 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1964
    Nubbe v. Hardy *485 Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 ; Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180 .
  • Wolle v. Jorgenson 99 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1959
  • Wolle v. Jorgenson 99 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1959
    Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 .
  • Hill v. Gaertner 92 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1958
  • Hill v. Gaertner 92 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1958
    2 Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 .
  • Strong v. Shefveland 81 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1957
  • Strong v. Shefveland 81 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1957
    2 Schrader v. Kriesel, supra; Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496, 499 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332, 334 ; McGenty v. John A. Stephenson & Co. 218 Minn. 311, 314 , 15 N. W. (2d) 874, 875 ; Iverson v. Quam, 226 Minn. 290 , 32 N. W. (2d) 596 .
  • Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957
  • Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957
    State v. Becker, 231 Minn. 174 , 42 N. W. (2d) 704 ; see, Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 .
  • State v. Stevens 80 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1956
  • State v. Stevens 80 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1956
    9 State v. Cavett, 171 Minn. 222 , ; Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Vosbeck v. Lerdall 72 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1955
  • Vosbeck v. Lerdall 72 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1955
    Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 ; see, Swenson v. Slawik, 236 Minn. 403 , 53 N. W. (2d) 107 ; Iverson v. Quam, 226 Minn. 290 , 32 N. W. (2d) 596 .
  • Standafer v. First National Bank 68 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
  • Standafer v. First National Bank 68 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
    Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 ; 26 Mich.
  • Hartmon v. National Heater Co. 60 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1953
  • Hartmon v. National Heater Co. 60 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1953
    Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 .
  • Graeber v. Anderson 53 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1952
  • Graeber v. Anderson 53 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1952
    And in Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496, 499 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332, 334 , where we held that there is a duty to inspect at reasonable intervals, we said: «X- * * Generally speaking, any defective condition in the premises caused by wear from prolonged and continual use is *27 brought into existence gradually and not suddenly, and although the landlord may not
  • Swenson v. Slawik 53 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1952
  • Swenson v. Slawik 53 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1952
    See, Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 ; Restatement, Torts, § 360, com ment a. In the instant case, it cannot be said as a matter of law that plaintiff’s attempts to close the ground-level door by the method described were so rash and dangerous as to constitute negligence.'
  • Baumgartner v. Holslin 52 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1952
  • Baumgartner v. Holslin 52 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1952
    Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 .
  • Seitzer v. Halverson 42 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1950
  • State v. Becker 42 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1950