Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hempel v. Hempel, 30 N.W.2d 594.

32 citing documents.

Marriage of Foster v. Childers 416 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Foster v. Childers 416 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finally, in Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , the court stated: A man of wealth can hire able counsel and enlist the support of other allies.
Marriage of Tollefson v. Tollefson 403 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tollefson v. Tollefson 403 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287
Kramer v. Kramer 372 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kramer v. Kramer 372 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287, 291
Obraske v. Woody 199 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1972
Obraske v. Woody 199 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1972
In re Living Trust created by Atwood, 227 Minn. 495 , Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287
State Ex Rel. Head v. Paulson 188 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1971
State Ex Rel. Head v. Paulson 188 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1971
Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 .
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach 175 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1970
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach 175 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1970
Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 .
Borchert v. Borchert 154 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1967
Borchert v. Borchert 154 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1967
The elements that should be taken into consideration are adequately stated in Ward v. Ward, supra, and Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 .
Schafer v. Schafer 144 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1966
Schafer v. Schafer 144 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1966
Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 .
Ward v. Ward 114 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1962
Ward v. Ward 114 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1962
In Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287, 293 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594, 598 , we said: “* * * It should be remembered, too, that the possession of wealth provides the possessor with the ‘sinews of war.’ A man of wealth can hire able counsel and enlist the support of other allies.
Botkin v. Botkin 77 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1956
Botkin v. Botkin 77 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1956
In Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287, 291 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594, 597 , this court quoted with approval from a New York case as follows: “* * * In coming to a conclusion as to the amount of alimony, the station in life of the husband, his means as shown by the testimony, including his expenditures, and his apparent condition, should be the criterion as to t
Kate v. Kate 48 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1951
Kate v. Kate 48 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1951
Compare awards made in Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 ; and Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 .
Carlson v. Carlson 48 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1951
Carlson v. Carlson 48 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1951
Wetter v. Wetter, 145 Minn. 499 , ; Stiehm v. Stiehm, 69 Minn. 461 , ; see, Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287, 292, 293 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594, 598 ; Bensel v. Hall, 177 Minn. 178 , ; see, also, 1 Nelson, Divorce and Annulment (2 ed.) p. 424; Annotation, 15 A. L. R. 781.
Swanson v. Swanson 46 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1951
Swanson v. Swanson 46 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1951
10 Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 , cited by plaintiff as controlling and decisive of the issues in this case, is particularly inapplicable to the facts before us here.
McKey v. McKey 36 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1949
McKey v. McKey 36 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1949
Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287, 292 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594, 598 ; Dahl v. Dahl, 210 Minn. 361 , .
In Re Living Trust Created by Atwood 35 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1949
Atwood v. Holmes 35 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1949
In Re Living Trust Created by Atwood 35 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1949
Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 293 , , 598 ; Blackhurst v. Johnson (8 Cir.) 72 F.2d 644 , 648 .
Atwood v. Holmes 35 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1949
Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287, 293 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594, 598 ; Blackhurst v. Johnson (8 Cir.) 72 F. (2d) 644, 648.