Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 32 N.W.2d 574.

59 citing documents.

A24-0425 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bd., -80 (Minn. 1948) (explaining that late submissions are problematic because an opposing party “does not know what evidence is offered or considered and, is not given an opportunity to test, explain, or refute” such evidence at the hearing).
In Re Brittain 724 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 2006
In Re Brittain 724 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 2006
Bd., 226 Minn. 240, 248-49
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
E.N. v. Special School District No. 1 603 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
E.N. v. Special School District No. 1 603 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bd., 226 Minn. 240, 247 , accord Hennepin County Community Servs.
In Re 1994 & 1995 Shoreline Improvement Contractor Licenses of Landview Landscaping, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re 1994 & 1995 Shoreline Improvement Contractor Licenses of Landview Landscaping, Inc. 546 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bd., 226 Minn. 240, 248-49
Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 494 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 494 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bd., 226 Minn. 240, 248-49
Ammend v. County of Isanti 486 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Ammend v. County of Isanti 486 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hennepin County Community Services Department v. Hale 470 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hennepin County Community Services Department v. Hale 470 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bd., 226 Minn. 240 , the Minnesota Supreme Court considered the rights a party has on appeal in an administrative proceeding when the statute that created the right of appeal is silent as to those rights.
Bettes v. Fuel-Scott 415 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bettes v. Fuel-Scott 415 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240, 247
Gutsch v. Hyatt Legal Services 403 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gutsch v. Hyatt Legal Services 403 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240, 247
Beaty v. Minnesota Board of Teaching 354 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Beaty v. Minnesota Board of Teaching 354 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240, 248
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 344 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1984
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 344 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1984
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240, 249
Township of Thomastown v. City of Staples 323 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1982
Township of Thomastown v. City of Staples 323 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1982
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240, 248-49
Honn v. City of Coon Rapids 313 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1981
Honn v. City of Coon Rapids 313 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1981
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240
Minn. Dept. of Hwys. v. MINN. DEPT. OF HR 241 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1976
Minnesota Department of Highways v. Minnesota Department of Human Rights 241 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1976
Minnesota Department of Highways v. Minnesota Department of Human Rights 241 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1976
Minn. Dept. of Hwys. v. MINN. DEPT. OF HR 241 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1976
Spurck v. Civil Service Bd., 226 Minn. 240
Mahnerd v. Canfield 211 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1973
Mahnerd v. Canfield 211 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1973
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240 , Id.
Ekstedt v. Village of New Hope 193 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1972
Ekstedt v. Village of New Hope 193 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1972
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240, 251
Curry v. Young 173 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1969
Curry v. Young 173 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1969
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240 , 32 N. W. (2d) 574 .
Bryan v. Community State Bank of Bloomington 172 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1969
Bryan v. Community State Bank of Bloomington 172 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1969
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240, 251 , 32 N. W. (2d) 574, 581 , this court discussed the matter of review of agency proceedings: “It is sometimes said that on certiorari the judgment should either affirm or reverse (quash) the proceedings brought up for review.
Mitchell Transport, Inc. v. Railroad & Warehouse Commission 137 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1965
Mitchell Transport, Inc. v. Railroad & Warehouse Commission 137 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1965
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240 , 32 N. W. (2d) 574 .
Webster v. Marshall 133 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1965
Webster v. Marshall 133 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1965
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240, 251 , 32 N. W. (2d) 574, 581 ; Sellin v. City of Duluth, 248 Minn. 333, 341, note 1 , 80 N. W. (2d) 67, 73 .
State Ex Rel. Saari v. State Civil Service Board 122 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1963
State Ex Rel. Saari v. State Civil Service Board 122 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1963
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240 , 32 N. W. (2d) 574 .
Johnson v. Village of Cohasset 116 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1962
Johnson v. Village of Cohasset 116 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1962
Spurck v. Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240 , 32 N. W. (2d) 574 .
Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN. 91 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1958
Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN. 91 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1958
“State Ex Rel Spurck vs Civil Service Board, 226 Minn. 240 at Page 251.
Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life Insurance 87 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1958