Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M., 32 N.W.2d 255.

53 citing documents.

Hohlt v. University of Minnesota 897 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2017
Hohlt v. University of Minnesota 897 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2017
See Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, 226 Minn. 141 , , 259 (1948) (holding that an icy sidewalk was a hazard arising out of employment).
David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
has come to a point which is not only immediately adjacent to the working premises but also within the range of hazards peculiarly associated with the employment.”); Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141, 143, 145–46, –58 (1948) (holding that maintenance man’s injury occurred in the course of employment when he slipped and fell on ice while entering the building where he performed maintenance in exchange for lodging).
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy 840 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2013
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy 840 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2013
at 21 ; see *827 also Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, 226 Minn. 141, 147-48 , (concluding that an employee’s injuries arose out of his employment when “as an incident and as an obligation of his employment, [he] was exposed to the risk of being upon an icy sidewalk constituting a part of the working premises”); Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.
Sazama Excavating, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 521 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Sazama Excavating, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 521 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
& A.M., 226 Minn. 141, 144 , (workers’ compensation act is sui generis, and concepts belonging to fundamentally different fields should not be applied to it); see also Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining, 232 Minn. 422, 428 , (rights and liabilities under Workers’ Compensation Act are imposed on
Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp. 424 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1988
Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp. 424 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1988
& A.M., 226 Minn. 141
Merrill v. J. C. Penney 256 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1977
Merrill v. J. C. Penney 256 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1977
Paul, 249 Minn. 53 , Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , 219 N.W.
Goff v. Farmers Union Accounting Service, Inc. 241 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1976
Goff v. Farmers Union Accounting Service, Inc. 241 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1976
Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141
Scheppman v. T & E SERVICE, INC. 177 N.W.2d 306 Minn. 1970
Scheppman v. T & E SERVICE, INC. 177 N.W.2d 306 Minn. 1970
Time is one of the factors included in the phrase “in the course of employment.” Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 .
Andrews v. Hoss 174 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1970
MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Biss 161 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1968
MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Biss 161 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1968
290 ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N.W.
Hill v. TERRAZZO MACHINE & SUPPLY COMPANY 157 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1968
Hill v. TERRAZZO MACHINE & SUPPLY COMPANY 157 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1968
Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 .
Snyder v. General Paper Corporation 152 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1967
Snyder v. General Paper Corporation 152 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1967
Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409 , 35 N. W. (2d) 719 ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 .
Bronson v. Joyner's Silver & Electroplating, Inc. 127 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1964
Bronson v. Joyner's Silver & Electroplating, Inc. 127 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1964
Paul, 249 Minn. 53 , 81 N. W. (2d) 272 ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 ; Oberg v. DuBeau, 202 Minn. 476 , ; Ludwig v. Farmers Shipping Assn. 181 Minn. 90, 91 , .
Johannsen v. ACTION CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 119 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1963
Johannsen v. ACTION CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 119 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1963
Co. 151 Minn. 258 , ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 ; Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , .
Swenson v. Zacher 118 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1962
Swenson v. Zacher 118 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1962
Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409 , 35 N. W. (2d) 719 ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 ; Caswell’s Case, 305 Mass. 500 ,26 N. E. (2d) 328.
Blattner v. Loyal Order of Moose 117 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1962
Blattner v. Loyal Order of Moose 117 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1962
Both respondent and relators cite Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 , as controlling.
Sweet v. Kolosky 106 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1960
Sweet v. Kolosky 106 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1960
In Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141, 144 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255, 257 , we quote with approval the following statement from Caswell’s Case, 305 Mass. 500, 502 , 26 N.E.
Nelson v. City of St. Paul 81 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 1957
Nelson v. City of St. Paul 81 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 1957
2 Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 209 Minn. 596 , ; Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. & A. M. 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 .
Petro v. Martin Baking Co. 58 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1953
Petro v. Martin Baking Co. 58 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1953
Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 ; Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 209 Minn. 596 , .
Sommers v. Schuler Chocolates, Inc. 58 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1953
Sommers v. Schuler Chocolates, Inc. 58 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1953
Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 .
Corcoran v. Fitzgerald Bros. 58 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1953
Corcoran v. Fitzgerald Bros. 58 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1953
In Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141, 144 , 82 N. W. (2d) 255, 257 , we held: “The phrase 'arising out of’ the employment expresses the factor of origin, source, or contribution rather than cause in the sense of being proximate or direct,” while “The companion phrase 'in the course of’ employment refers to the factors of time and place” Nearly all courts
Weidenbach v. Miller 55 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1952
Weidenbach v. Miller 55 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1952
In Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 , we cited with approval Caswell’s Case, 305 Mass. 500 , 26 N. E. (2d) 328, supra; and again in Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409, 421 , 35 N. W. (2d) 719, 728 , where we applied the same definition, we said: “* * * It is not primarily a question of whether the hazard is peculiar to the employme
Frankle v. Twedt 47 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1951
Frankle v. Twedt 47 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1951
See, Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 ; Riesenfeld-Maxwell, Id.
Yeager v. Chapman 45 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1951
Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 45 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1951
Yeager v. Chapman 45 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1951
We do not here have an identity of both time and destination as in Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 .
Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 45 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1951
5 See, Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141, 144 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255, 257 ; Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 209 Minn. 596 , ; Horovitz, Current Trends in Workmen’s Compensation, pp. 509-511.
McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks 226 P.2d 147 Ariz. 1950