DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rue v. Wendland, 33 N.W.2d 593.

38 citing documents.

  • Milbank Insurance Co. v. B.L.G. 484 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • Milbank Insurance Co. v. B.L.G. 484 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    The duty to use reasonable care to avoid injuring others is an affirmative duty requiring a person “to exercise his senses * * * for the protection of others.” Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449, 453
  • M.M.D. v. B.L.G. 467 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • Mmd v. Blg 467 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • M.M.D. v. B.L.G. 467 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    v. R.L., (citing Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449, 452-53 , -96 (1948)).
  • Mmd v. Blg 467 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    v. R.L., (citing Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449, 452-53 , -96 (1948)).
  • Otto v. City of St. Paul 460 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • Otto v. City of St. Paul 460 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    Men cannot be expected to govern their actions by what to them lies in the realm of the unknown [emphasis in original].” Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449, 452-53 , -96 (1948) (citations omitted).
  • C.A.U. v. R.L. 438 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Cau v. Rl 438 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Cau v. Rl 438 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449, 452-53 , -96 (1948).
  • C.A.U. v. R.L. 438 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449, 452-53 , -96 (1948).
  • Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1973
  • Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1973
    6 See, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449
  • Wire v. Williams 133 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
  • Wire v. Williams 133 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
    Thompson v. Peterson, 235 Minn. 142 , 50 N. W. (2d) 53 ; Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. *394 (2d) 593 .
  • Erlandson v. Northern States Power Co. 104 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1960
  • Erlandson v. Northern States Power Co. 104 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1960
    In Neumann v. Interstate Power Co. 179 Minn. 46 , ; Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Theisen v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 200 Minn. 515 , ; Standafer v. First Nat.
  • Sowada v. Motzko 98 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1959
  • Sowada v. Motzko 98 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1959
    2 Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 .
  • Gray v. First National Bank of Crosby 85 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1957
  • Gray v. First National Bank of Crosby 85 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1957
    In Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449, 453 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593, 596 , we said: “One’s perception, memory, and experience bear upon the question of whether he had knowledge.
  • Peterson v. Truelson 83 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1957
  • Peterson v. Truelson 83 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1957
    1 See, also, Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Thompson v. Peterson, 235 Minn. 142 , 50 N. W. (2d) 53 .
  • Bielinski v. Colwell 65 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1954
  • Bielinski v. Colwell 65 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1954
    § 169.96; Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Flitton v. Daleki, 216 Minn. 549 , 13 N. W. (2d) 477 ; Wojtowicz v. Belden, 211 Minn. 461 , 1 N. W. (2d) 409 .
  • Manteuffel v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 56 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1952
  • Rugg v. Rugg 50 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 1951
  • Rugg v. Rugg 50 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 1951
    For general discussions of due care and proximate cause, see Mingo v. Extrand, 180 Minn. 395, 397 , ; Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Christianson v. C. St.
  • Thompson v. Peterson 50 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1951
  • Thompson v. Peterson 50 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1951
    Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • McDonald v. Fryberger 46 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1951
  • McDonald v. Fryberger 46 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1951
    Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Goede v. Rondorf 43 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1950
  • Despatch Oven Co. v. Rauenhorst 40 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1949
  • Despatch Oven Co. v. Rauenhorst 40 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1949
    Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
  • Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
    Minn. 334 , 19 N. W. [2d] 812, supra); where atmospheric conditions such as a heavy snowstorm obscure the driver’s *163 view of a car standing on the traveled portion of the highway (Henry v. Hallquist, 226 Minn. 39 , 31 N. W. [2d] 641); or where the driver is misled by blinding lights on a car standing on the left shoulder after it has cut across from its right side of the road (Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. [2d] 593).