Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carlson v. Fredsall, 37 N.W.2d 744.

44 citing documents.

Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Karmen Michelle Ingersoll, as Trustee for the next of kin of Thomas Wade Ingersoll, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Kelly v. Ellefson 712 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 2006
Kelly v. Ellefson 712 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 2006
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461, 472-73 , -51 (1949).
State v. Hofer 614 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Hofer 614 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461, 468 , (quotation and citation omitted).
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett 490 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1992
Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett 490 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1992
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461, 467
Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461, 467 , (mere fact that one party was more negligent than another does not release the less negligent party from liability).
Maanum v. Aust 364 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Maanum v. Aust 364 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461, 467
Lines v. Ryan 272 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1978
Lines v. Ryan 272 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1978
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461
Bowe v. Fredlund 203 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1972
Bowe v. Fredlund 203 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1972
In Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , we held that allegations in a pleading which are in the nature of admissions are admissible for impeachment purposes where they tend to contradict the testimony of a party.
Anderson v. HEDGES MOTOR COMPANY 164 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1969
Anderson v. HEDGES MOTOR COMPANY 164 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1969
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 .
Mikes v. Baumgartner 152 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 1967
Mikes v. Baumgartner 152 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 1967
It is now claimed that this omission, as an error with respect to fundamental law, can be raised for the first time on appeal, citing Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 .
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
Co. 253 Minn. 52 , 91 N. W. (2d) 178 ; Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 ; Krumholz v. Rusak, 230 Minn. 178 , 41 N. W. (2d) 177 .
Johnson v. Lorraine Park Apts. Inc. 128 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1964
Johnson v. Lorraine Park Apts. Inc. 128 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1964
The issue raised is controlled by Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 , and Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 , which authorities hold that reference to pleadings by the adversary of the pleader may be proper for the purpose of impeachment or to show an admission.
State Ex Rel. Anderson v. United States Veterans Hospital 128 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1964
State Ex Rel. Anderson v. United States Veterans Hospital 128 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1964
21 See, Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 .
Routh v. Routh 97 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1959
Routh v. Routh 97 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1959
(3 ed.) § 7143; Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 ; Parrish v. Peoples, 214 Minn. 589 , 9 N. W. (2d) 225 .
Dornberg v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
Dornberg v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 .
Frank v. Stiegler 84 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1957
Frank v. Stiegler 84 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1957
Co. 48 Minn. 433 , ; Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 .
Eicher v. Universal Underwriters 83 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1957
Eicher v. Universal Underwriters 83 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1957
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 .
Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
Distinguished Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
As to use of pleadings for impeachment purposes, see Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 .
Beebe v. Kleidon 65 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1954
Beebe v. Kleidon 65 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1954
Cf. Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 ; Koski v. Muccilli, 201 Minn. 549 , .
Wilson Storage & Transfer Co. v. Geurkink 64 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1954
Wilson Storage & Transfer Co. v. Geurkink 64 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1954
The rule, however, has now been clearly stated in the recent case of Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 .
Krumholz v. Rusak 41 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1950
Krumholz v. Rusak 41 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1950
In Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 , we reviewed the various authorities on this question and concluded that an unverified pleading was admissible, although the party against whom it is admitted for the purpose of impeachment may show that he did not have knowledge of its contents.
Foster v. Bock 39 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1949
Foster v. Bock 39 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1949
Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 , is not in point.