Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 34 N.W.2d 725.

26 citing documents.

Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Minn. 2020
George Benz Sons, 8 8 We reject petitioners’ proposal to apply strict scrutiny to this claim.
Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council v. Smith 667 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council v. Smith 667 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1, 15-16 , (finding that controlling sales by manufacturers and wholesalers but not controlling sales by retailers was arbitrary).
State v. Berge 464 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Jacobsen v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1986
Jacobsen v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1986
390 , 34 L.Ed.2d 342 (1972); George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1 , Sail’er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby, 5 Cal.3d 1 , 95 Cal.Rptr.
Haskell's Inc. v. Sopsic 306 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1981
Haskell's Inc. v. Sopsic 306 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1981
The Rational Relationship Between the Statute’s Classification and Purpose Appellants contend that in the absence of a credit prohibition on sales of wine and liquor from wholesalers to retailers, the Cash Beer Law is the kind of discrimination condemned in George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1
Invention Marketing, Inc. v. Spannaus 279 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1979
Invention Marketing, Inc. v. Spannaus 279 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1979
921, 926 (D.Minn.1976); Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State, 304 Minn. 28 , George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1
Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State 229 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1975
Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State 229 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1975
George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1
State v. Saugen 169 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1969
State v. Saugen 169 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1969
George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1, 10 , 34 N. W. (2d) 725, 730 ; Paron v. City of Shakopee, 226 Minn. 222 , 32 N. W. (2d) 603 , 2 A. L. R. (2d) 1227.” (Italics supplied.)
Northern States Power Company v. Esperson 144 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1966
Northern States Power Company v. Esperson 144 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1966
See, also, George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1 , 34 N. W. (2d) 725 ; State v. Northwestern Preparatory School, Inc. 228 Minn. 363 , 37 N. W. (2d) 370 ; 1 Nichols, Eminent Domain (3 ed.) § 4.15.
Beck v. Groe 70 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1955
Beck v. Groe 70 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1955
(3 ed.) § 4905; Paron v. City of Shakopee, 226 Minn. 222 , 32 N. W. (2d) 603 , 2 A. L. R. (2d) 1227; George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1 , 34 N. W. (2d) 725 .
Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
That the field of liquor control legislation is no exception is amply demonstrated in this court’s opinion in George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1, 10 , 34 N. W. (2d) 725, 731 , where this court said: “Conceding that the state has the power to control and regulate the sale of intoxicating liquors, it must also be conceded that in doing so it has the power to make necessary classifications.” *395 Population has been one of the common types of classification emplo
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1 , 34 N. W. (2d) 725 .
State v. Northwestern Preparatory School, Inc. 37 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1949
State v. Northwestern Preparatory School, Inc. 37 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1949
George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1 , 34 N. W. (2d) 725 ; Anderson v. City of St.
Mid-West Wine Co. Inc. v. Ericson 34 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1948
Mid-West Wine Co. Inc. v. Ericson 34 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1948
Second, L. 1947, c. 528, is declared unconstitutional by this court in the companion case of George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1 , 34 N. W. (2d) 725 , filed herewith.