Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lee v. Delmont, 36 N.W.2d 530.

133 citing documents.

Wallace v. Commissioner of Taxation 184 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1971
Brown v. Johnson, 255 Minn. 134 , 96 N. W. (2d) 9 ; Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .
Anderson v. Commissioner of Highways 126 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1964
Anderson v. Commissioner of Highways 126 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1964
wer may be delegated to administrative officers “[i]f the law furnishes a reasonably clear policy or standard of action which controls and guides the administrative officers in ascertaining the operative facts to which the law applies, so that the law takes effect upon these facts by virtue of its own terms, and not according to the whim or caprice of the administrative officers.” Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101, 113 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530, 538 ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
Melco Investment Co. v. Gapp 105 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1960
Melco Investment Co. v. Gapp 105 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1960
14 Naffke v. Naffke, 240 Minn. 468 , 62 N. W. (2d) 63 ; Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .
Remington Arms Co. v. G. E. M. of St. Louis, Inc. 102 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1960
Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
2 See, Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .
Remington Arms Co. v. G. E. M. of St. Louis, Inc. 102 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1960
Williams v. Evans, 139 Minn. 32, 41 , , , L. R. A. 1918F, 542, 545, we pointed out: “* * * If, by the terms of the act, it is to be effective only in case a commission deems the act expedient, then there is a delegation of legislative power and the act is void, for a determination of legislative expediency can be made by the legislature alone.” In Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101, 113 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530, 538 , we said: “* * * Pure legislative power, which can never be delegated, is the authority t
State Ex Rel. Brown v. Johnson 96 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Brown v. Johnson 96 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1959
In Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101, 113 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530, 538 , we said: “* * * If the law furnishes a reasonably clear policy or standard of action which controls and guides the administrative officers in ascertaining the operative facts to which the law applies, so that the law takes effect upon these facts by virtue of its own terms, and not acco
Reyburn v. Minnesota State Board of Optometry 78 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1956
Reyburn v. Minnesota State Board of Optometry 78 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1956
In Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101, 113 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530, 538 , this court said: “* * * Although discretion to determine when and upon whom a law shall take effect may not be delegated, the legislature may confer upon a board or commission a discretionary power to ascertain, under and pursuant to the law, some fact or circumstance upon which the law
City of St. Paul v. Dalsin 71 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1955
City of St. Paul v. Dalsin 71 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1955
11 See, Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 ; 11 Am.
State v. Sullivan 71 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1955
State v. Sullivan 71 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1955
What we said in Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101, 112 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530, 538 , is applicable here : “Clearly, the statutory provisions involved herein reasonably tend to accomplish the purpose of safeguarding the public health and welfare without going beyond the reasonable demands of the occasion.
Fairview Hospital Ass'n v. Public Building Service & Hospital & Institutional Employees Union, Local No. 113 64 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1954
Fairview Hospital Ass'n v. Public Building Service & Hospital & Institutional Employees Union, Local No. 113 64 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1954
Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .
Kiges v. City of St. Paul 62 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1953
Kiges v. City of St. Paul 62 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1953
of Public Works, 274 U. S. 325 , 47 S. Ct. 594 , 71 L. ed. 1074; Dennis v. Village of Tonka Bay (8 Cir.) 156 F. (2d) 672; Leighton v. City of Minneapolis (D. Minn.) 16 F. Supp. 101 ; City of Tucson v. Arizona Mortuary, 34 Ariz. 495 , 272 P. 923 ; Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. White, 296 U. S. 176 , 56 S. Ct. 159 , 80 L. ed. 138; Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Central Trust Co. v. City of Cincinnati, 62 Ohio App. 139 , 23 N. E. (2d) 450; Brett v. Building Commr.
Naffke v. Naffke 62 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1953
Naffke v. Naffke 62 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1953
Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Kennedy v. Thompson Lbr.
State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
(2d) 353 , appeal dismissed, 339 U.S. 907 , 70 S. Ct. 574 , 94 L. ed. 1335; Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N.W.
Minneapolis Federation of Men Teachers v. Board of Education 56 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1952
Minneapolis Federation of Men Teachers v. Board of Education 56 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1952
Their insecurity is not based upon a hypothetical case which has no existence other than in the realm of future possibility *158 as in the case of Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 , but has an actual and present existence similar to that of the plaintiff in Harrington v. Fairchild, supra.
Olson v. Olson 53 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1952
Olson v. Olson 53 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1952
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , ; Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .