34,772.
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
State v. Longyear Holding Co.
Cited by
- Wurdemann v. Hjelm 110 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1961
- State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451
- School District No. 1, Itasca County v. Aiton 175 Minn. 346
- Skog v. Pomush 221 Minn. 11
Opinion text
Per Curiam. The assignments of error raise the identical questions presented on the former appeal from an order dénying defendants’ motion for a new trial. State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451 , 29 N. W. (2d) 657 . Where an order denying a new trial has been affirmed on appeal, all questions that might have been raised therein are set at rest and cannot be raised on a subsequent appeal from the judgment. School Dist. No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346, 348 , 221 N. W. 424, 425 ; Skog v. Pomush, 221 Minn. 11 , 20 N. W. (2d) 530 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig. & Supp. § 398. Hence, the decision on the former appeal is decisive here. Judgment affirmed.