Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Loth v. Loth, 35 N.W.2d 542.

258 citing documents.

Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson 357 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Supreme Court has held that a trial court may consider past earnings in setting child support “to determine whether because of extraordinary reasons his income for a particular year was no guide.” Fruen v. Fruen, 228 Minn. 391, 399 , (citing Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 399 , ).
Marriage of Otis v. Otis 299 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1980
Clark v. Clark 288 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1979
Clark v. Clark 288 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1979
See, Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387
Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 400 , , 6 A.L.R.2d 176, 186 (1949).
Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority House 276 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1979
Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority House 276 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1979
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392
Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc. 237 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1975
Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc. 237 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1975
See, also, Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392 , , 6 A. L. R. 2d 176, 182 (1949).
Hertz v. Hertz 229 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1975
Hertz v. Hertz 229 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1975
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117
Bloomer v. Bloomer 185 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1971
Bloomer v. Bloomer 185 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1971
No. 1, 248 Minn. 212 , 79 N. W. (2d) 428 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; 1 C. J. S., Accord and Satisfaction, §§ 48a, 48c, and 49b; 1 Am.
Schwerm v. Schwerm 175 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1970
Schwerm v. Schwerm 175 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1970
See, also, Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176 , 54 N. W. (2d) 137 ; and Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Kucera v. Kucera 146 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1966
Kucera v. Kucera 146 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1966
See, Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
No. 1, 248 Minn. 212 , 79 N. W. (2d) 428 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Donovan v. Dixon 113 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1962
Donovan v. Dixon 113 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1962
See, State v. McCoy, 228 Minn. 420 , 38 N. W. (2d) 386 ; Holz v. Pearson, 229 Minn. 395 , 39 N. W. (2d) 867 ; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 137 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 , *461 284; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
In Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542, 546 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176, this court said: “* * * f0]i0WS that ^ this court a finding of the trial court is attended with every presumption of evidentiary support.
Grant v. Malkerson Sales, Inc. 108 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1961
Grant v. Malkerson Sales, Inc. 108 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1961
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; First Trust Co. v. McLean, 254 Minn. 75 , 93 N. W. (2d) 517 .
Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. Zacho 104 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1960
Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. Zacho 104 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1960
2 Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52.01; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; Greer v. Stannard, 85 Mont.
Stephenson v. Stephenson 104 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1960
Stephenson v. Stephenson 104 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1960
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 .
G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
Corp. 246 Minn. 417 , 75 N. W. (2d) 203 ; Cyrus v. Cyrus, 242 Minn. 180 , 64 N. W. (2d) 538 , 45 A. L. R. (2d) 1002; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; Rebne v. Rebne, 216 Minn. 379 , 13 N. W. (2d) 18 ; In re Estate of Christ, 166 Minn. 374 , .
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
No. 1, 248 Minn. 212 , 79 N. W. (2d) 428 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958
First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958
4 Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Dempsey v. Meighen 90 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
Dempsey v. Meighen 90 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
Corah v. Corah, 246 Minn. 350 , 75 N. W. (2d) 465 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; In re Estate of Christ, 166 Minn. 374 , .
Johnson v. Johnson 84 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1957
Johnson v. Johnson 84 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1957
2 Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Webber v. Webber, 157 Minn. 422 , .
Corah v. Corah 75 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1956
Corah v. Corah 75 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1956
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Albertson v. Albertson 67 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1954
Albertson v. Albertson 67 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1954
4 Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176 , 54 N. W. (2d) 137 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Marquardt v. Stark 58 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1953
Marquardt v. Stark 58 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1953
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; Village of Minneota v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 226 Minn. 1 , 31 N. W. (2d) 920 .
Swanson v. Swanson 46 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1951
Swanson v. Swanson 46 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1951
In Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 400 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542, 550 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176, this court stated: “* * * While the statute authorizes an award of one-third of the husband’s property and income, it does not follow in every case that one-third thereof should be awarded.” In Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117, 120 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164, 167 , this court
Caskey v. Lewandowski 46 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1951
Caskey v. Lewandowski 46 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1951
5 Walley v. Sweet, 220 Minn. 545 , 20 N. W. (2d) 528 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.