Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jacobsen v. Dailey, 36 N.W.2d 711.

28 citing documents.

  • Hutchings v. Bourdages 189 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
  • Hutchings v. Bourdages 189 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
    by the negligent operation of automobiles an approximate certainty of an effective recovery by making the registered owner, who is [encouraged by the act] to take out insurance to cover his liability * * *, responsible as well as the possibly or probably irresponsible person whom the owner permits to drive the car * * Restatement, Torts, § 485, comment b, quoted approvingly in Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201, 207 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711, 714 .
  • Schwalich v. Guenther 166 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1969
  • Schwalich v. Guenther 166 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1969
    4 See, Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429; Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
  • Pesqueira v. Talbot 441 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • Wick v. Widdell 149 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1967
  • Wick v. Widdell 149 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1967
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945; Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 ; Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429; Knutson v. Nielsen, 256 Minn. 506 , 99 N. W. (2d) 215 .
  • Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. 144 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1966
  • Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. 144 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1966
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945, which was followed in Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429.
  • Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
  • Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945; Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429.
  • Sowada v. Motzko 98 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1959
  • Sowada v. Motzko 98 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 1959
    Co. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945; Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429; Sackett v. Haeckel, 249 Minn. 290 , 81 N. W. (2d) 833 ; 5A Am.
  • Sackett v. Haeckel 81 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1957
  • Sackett v. Haeckel 81 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1957
    1 Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429; Frankie v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482 ; Urquhart v. McEvoy, 204 Misc.
  • Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
  • Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
    See, Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201, 210 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711, 716 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429.
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
    Frankle v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482 ; Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429; Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 ; Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
  • Frankle v. Twedt 47 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1951
  • Frankle v. Twedt 47 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1951
    Restatement, Torts, § 486; see, Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201, 209 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711, 716 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429.
  • Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co. 47 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1951
  • Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co. 47 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1951
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394, 407 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406, 414 , 147 A. L. R. 945; Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201, 209 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711, 716 .
  • Ristau v. Riley 41 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1950
  • Ristau v. Riley 41 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1950
    We recently held in Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , that under § 170.54 (the safety responsibility act) the negligence of a bailee of an automobile is not imputable to the bailor, even where they occupy the relation of parent and child and the child lives with the parent as a member of his family.
  • Carlson v. Fredsall 37 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1949
  • Ellingboe v. Guerin 36 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1949
  • Ellingboe v. Guerin 36 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1949
    *215 In our decision in Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , filed herewith, we hold that the family-purpose doctrine is merged with M. S. A. 170.54 of the safety responsibility act and superseded by it, and that it is no longer to be considered a rule of law in this state.