Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Atwood v. Atwood, 39 N.W.2d 103.

25 citing documents.

Amplatz v. Amplatz 289 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1980
Amplatz v. Amplatz 289 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1980
See, e. g., Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333
Rabuse v. Rabuse 231 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1975
Rabuse v. Rabuse 231 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1975
Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 2; Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103 ; Dovi v. Dovi, 245 Wis.
Christenson v. Christenson 162 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1968
Christenson v. Christenson 162 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1968
admit or deny the truth of the requested admissions on the ground of self-incrimination, and should defendant nevertheless not be granted any relief, the trial court will still retain jurisdiction in this same action “under its general equitable powers, to make provisions for the care and custody of the minor children where the parents are in fact living apart from each other.” Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333, 337 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103, 106 .
Eckerly v. LAKE REGION SIGN COMPANY 148 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1967
Eckerly v. LAKE REGION SIGN COMPANY 148 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1967
Plaintiff relies primarily on Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103 ; Gran v. Gran, 129 Minn. 531 , ; Buffalo Land & Exploration Co. v. Strong, 101 Minn. 27 , ; Whitaker v. McClung, 14 Minn. 131 (170); and Todd v. Bettingen, 102 Minn. 260 , .
In Re Trust Created by Atwood 114 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1962
In Re Trust Created by Atwood 114 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1962
Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103 .
Eisel v. Eisel 110 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1961
Eisel v. Eisel 110 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1961
3 Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333, 336 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103, 105 , 34 Minn. L. Rev. 347 ; In re Adoption of Zavasky, 241 Minn. 447, 451 , 63 N. W. (2d) 573, 576 ; Stoll v. Stoll, 243 Minn. 510, 515 , 68 N. W. (2d) 367, 371 .
Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 2; Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103 ; Dovi v. Dovi, 245 Wis.
Cummiskey v. Cummiskey 107 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1961
Cummiskey v. Cummiskey 107 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1961
Section 518.18 gives the court authority to revise its order from time to time thereafter “as the circumstances of the parentis and the benefit of the children shall require.” The husband, relying on Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103 , and Atwood v. Atwood, 253 Minn. 185 , 91 N. W. (2d) 728 , contends that after denying a divorce a court retains jurisdiction under its general equitable powers with reference to the custody of minor children where their parents are living apart.
Chopp v. Chopp 102 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1960
Chopp v. Chopp 102 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1960
3 Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103 .
Atwood v. Atwood 91 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1958
Atwood v. Atwood 91 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1958
The initial action in the proceedings here involved (Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333 , 39 N. W. [2d] 103) was commenced in the District Court of Hennepin County as an action for separate mainte *187 nance, of which that court had original jurisdiction.
State of Illinois Ex Rel. Shannon v. Sterling 80 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1956
State of Illinois Ex Rel. Shannon v. Sterling 80 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1956
In Atwood v. Atwood, 9 229 Minn. 333, 338 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103, 106 , we said: *278 “* * * Although the granting of a divorce is purely statutory, it is fundamental that, when a statute is passed authorizing courts in equity in divorce actions to determine the custody of children, it merely makes applicable to divorce actions an equitable jurisdiction whi
Rhein v. Rhein 69 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1955
Rhein v. Rhein 69 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1955
7 See, Atwood v. Atwood, 229 Minn. 333, 336, note 4 , 39 N. W. (2d) 103, 105, note 3 , and cases cited.
Stoll v. Stoll 68 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1955