Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Insurance Co., 36 N.W.2d 703.

26 citing documents.

Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Quoc D. Huynh, Quoc D. Huynh, Third-party v. Nathan Hintze d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Quoc D. Huynh, Quoc D. Huynh, Third-party v. Nathan Hintze d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Chris/Rob Realty v. Chrysler Realty Corp. 260 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1977
Chris/Rob Realty v. Chrysler Realty Corp. 260 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1977
Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Insurance Co., 228 Minn. 256 , Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co., 255 Minn. 98
Nyberg v. Wermerskirschen 233 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1975
Nyberg v. Wermerskirschen 233 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1975
Winona National & Savings Bank v. Sheehan 222 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1974
In Re Estate of Lea 222 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1974
Winona National & Savings Bank v. Sheehan 222 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1974
Co. 228 Minn. 256, 263 , In re Estate of Eklund, supra; Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co. 255 Minn. 98 , Engel v. Starry, 268 Minn. 252
In Re Estate of Lea 222 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1974
Co., 228 Minn. 256, 263 , In re Estate of Eklund, supra; Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co., 255 Minn. 98 , Engel v. Starry, 268 Minn. 252
Roeder v. North American Life Insurance 106 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1960
Roeder v. North American Life Insurance 106 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1960
Co. 228 Minn. 256, 260 , 36 N. W. (2d) 703, 706 , that “A standard life insurance policy issued without medical examination is subject to § 61.24 and not to § 60.85.” Other controlling cases are: Siemers v. United Benefit Life Ins.
Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co. 95 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1959
Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co. 95 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1959
Co. 228 Minn. 256, 263 , 36 N. W. (2d) 703 , 707: “There should be no confusion about what is meant by a liberal construction or a fair and reasonable construction to accomplish the purpose of the statute.
Alsleben v. Oliver Corporation 94 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1959
Alsleben v. Oliver Corporation 94 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1959
Co. 228 Minn. 256 , 36 N. W. (2d) 703 .
Pearson v. Bertelson 69 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1955
Pearson v. Bertelson 69 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1955
Co. 228 Minn. 256 , 36 N. W. (2d) 703 , held that the operation of the dead man’s statute, to the full extent intended hy the legislature, is not to be cut down, evaded, or defeated by disregarding the unitary character of a conversation with a decedent and admitting into evidence the words spoken by the surviving participants whereby
Ehmke v. Hill 51 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1952
Ehmke v. Hill 51 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1952
Co. 228 Minn. 256 , 36 N. W. (2d) 703 , and cases cited therein; In re Estate of Eklund, 233 Minn. 519 , 47 N. W. (2d) 422 .
Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler 50 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1951
Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler 50 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1951
Co. 228 Minn. 256 , 36 N. W. (2d) 703 , and cases therein cited.
Smith v. Utah Home Fire Insurance 47 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1951
Smith v. Utah Home Fire Insurance 47 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1951
Co. 228 Minn. 256 , 36 N. W. (2d) 703 .
Eklund v. Eklund 47 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1951
Eklund v. Eklund 47 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1951
Co. 228 Minn. 256 , 36 N. W. (2d) 703 .