Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bock, 39 N.W.2d 887.

62 citing documents.

State v. Swaney 787 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2010
State v. Swaney 787 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2010
We have said that evidence of an alternative perpetrator’s other crimes, wrongs, or bad acts — sometimes called re verse — Spreigl evidence — is admissible “to cast reasonable doubt upon the identification of the defendant as the person who committed the charged crime.” Jones, d at 16 ; see also State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458
State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
Hawkins, d at 159 ; see also State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458-59 , -93 (1949).
Huff v. State 698 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2005
Huff v. State 698 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2005
(quoting State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458 , ).
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
Hawkins, d at 159 (internal citations omitted); see State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458-59 , -93 (1949).
State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458
State v. Gutierrez 667 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2003
State v. Gutierrez 667 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2003
eged third-party perpetrator to the charged offense, the defendant may go forward with evidence showing “crimes of a similar nature have been committed by [the third person] when the acts of such other person are so closely connected in point of time and method of operation as to cast doubt upon the identification of defendant as the person who committed the [charged offense].” See State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458 , quoted in Johnson, d at 433 (defining revers e-Spreigl evidence).
State v. Williams 593 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1999
State v. Williams 593 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1999
We have long recognized that a criminal defendant should “have the right to show that crimes of a similar nature have been committed by some other person when the acts of such other person are so closely connected in point of time and method of operation as to cast doubt upon the identification of defendant as the person who committed the crime charged against him.” State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458
State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
28, 1997); State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458
State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
The leading case regarding reverse Spreigl evidence is State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449
State v. Higgins 422 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Higgins 422 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , the supreme court held a criminal defendant, to negate his own guilt, may show other crimes of a similar nature have been committed about the same time by someone other than himself.
State v. Volk 421 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Volk 421 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458
State v. Porter 411 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Porter 411 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449
State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458
State v. Willis 364 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Willis 364 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , the leading Minnesota decision on “reverse Spreigl ” evidence, the supreme court held that a criminal defendant, to negate his guilt, may show that other crimes of a similar nature have been committed at or about the same time by some person other than himself.
State v. Hawkins 260 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1977
State v. Hawkins 260 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1977
See, also, State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , State v. Staveneau, 158 Minn. 329 , 197 N.W.
State v. Titworth 255 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1977
State v. Titworth 255 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1977
In State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , three recipients of forged checks identified defendant as the man who passed them.
State v. Hawn 182 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1970
State v. Hawn 182 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1970
See, State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 .
State v. O'DONNELL 158 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1968
State v. O'DONNELL 158 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1968
State v. Lucken, 129 Minn. 402 , ; State v. Barrett, 40 Minn. 65 , ; State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 .
State v. Drews 144 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1966
State v. Drews 144 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1966
State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , 139 N. W. *430 (2d) 167; State v. Elli, 267 Minn. 185 , 125 N. W. (2d) 738 ; State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 35 N. W. (2d) 887 .
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
cites in support of this motion the cases of State v. Myers, 154 Minn. 242 , , involving repudiation of his testimony by a key witness; State v. Star, 248 Minn. 571 , 81 N. W. (2d) 94 , involving a confession and exoneration by a person who did not testify at the trial; State v. Warren, 252 Minn. 261 , 89 N. W. (2d) 702 , involving admission of mistaken identity; and State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 , which involved a question again of mistaken identity and an admission by anothe
State v. Sutton 138 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1965
State v. Sutton 138 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1965
State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 .
State v. Norgaard 136 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1965
State v. Norgaard 136 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1965
See, State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 ; State v. Quirk, 101 Minn. 334 , .
State v. Elli 125 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1964
State v. Kline 124 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1963
State v. Kline 124 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1963
11 State v. Hacker, 153 Minn. 538 , ; State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 .
State v. Polk 116 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1962
State v. Polk 116 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1962
More recently in approving the introduction of other forged checks we summarized the rule in State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 454 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887, 890 , (reversed on other grounds) as follows: “It is a general rule that evidence of separate and independent crimes is inadmissible to prove the guilt of a person charged with having committed a crime.