Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Howard v. Marchildon, 37 N.W.2d 833.
- State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ...
7 N.W.3d 418
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
601, 602 (Minn. 1934), (“Where a party having the burden of proof with respect to a particular issue fails to sustain such burden, decision as to such issue must go against him.”); Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co., 215 N.W.
-
City of Waite Park, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
601, 602 (Minn. 1934), cited in State v. Curtis, 921 (“Where a party having the burden of proof with respect to a particular issue fails to sustain such burden, decision as to such issue must go against him.”); Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co., 215 N.W.
- Athena 2004, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State v. Curtis 921 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2018
-
State v. Curtis
921 N.W.2d 342
Minn. 2018
See also Howard v. Marchildon , 228 Minn. 539 , , 836 (1949) ("Where a party having the burden of proof with respect to a particular issue fails to sustain such burden, decision as to such issue must go against him."); Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. , 172 Minn. 439 , 215 N.W.
- Aanenson v. Engelson 124 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1963
-
Aanenson v. Engelson
124 N.W.2d 360
Minn. 1963
4 § 169.15 provides in part: “No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation or in compliance with law.” 5 See, Greene v. Mathiowetz, 212 Minn. 171 , 3 N. W. (2d) 97 ; Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Nash v. Christenson, 241 Minn. 164 , 62 N. W. (2d) 800 ; Satter v. Turner, 251 Minn. 1 , 86 N. W. (2d) 85 , 66 A. L. R. (2d) 1178; Lee v
- Barclay v. O'DELL 123 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1963
-
Barclay v. O'DELL
123 N.W.2d 681
Minn. 1963
10 Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539, 547 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833, 838 ; Turnbloom v. Crichton, 189 Minn. 588, 590 , .
- Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. Zimmerman 121 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1963
-
Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. Zimmerman
121 N.W.2d 586
Minn. 1963
Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 .
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Wusich 375 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1962
- Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
-
Bush v. Havir
91 N.W.2d 784
Minn. 1958
We held in Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 , that a violation of the Highway Traffic Regulation Act constituting prima facie evidence of contributory negligence is no defense unless it is found to constitute contributory negligence as a matter of fact and also unless such contributory negligence was a proximate cause of the harm for which r
- Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
-
Thelen v. Spilman
86 N.W.2d 700
Minn. 1957
3 Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539, 545 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833, 837 .
- Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
-
Satter v. Turner
86 N.W.2d 85
Minn. 1957
Howard v. Maxchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Nash v. Christenson, 241 Minn. 164 , 62 N. W. (2d) 800 .
- Alex v. Jozelich 78 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1956
-
Alex v. Jozelich
78 N.W.2d 440
Minn. 1956
Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Landeen v. DeJung, 219 Minn. 287 , 17 N. W. (2d) 648 .
- Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
-
Storbakken v. Soderberg
75 N.W.2d 496
Minn. 1956
Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; 13 Dunnell, Dig.
- Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
-
Anderson v. Enfield
70 N.W.2d 409
Minn. 1955
Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Spencer v. Johnson, 203 Minn. 402 , ; Roach v. Roth, 156 Minn. 107 , ; Robertson v. Spitler, 153 Minn. 395 , .
- Ristau v. Riley 41 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1950
-
Ristau v. Riley
41 N.W.2d 772
Minn. 1950
Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 .