Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co., 38 N.W.2d 223.

39 citing documents.

Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services 841 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2014
Moore v. Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota 385 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Moore v. Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota 385 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Quest Foundry Co., 229 Minn. 131, 143
Metropolitan Medical Center v. Richardville 354 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Metropolitan Medical Center v. Richardville 354 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Quest Foundry Company, [ 229 Minn. 131 ], Sunstar Foods v. Uhlendorf
Auger v. Gillette Co. 303 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1981
Auger v. Gillette Co. 303 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1981
It is the declared public policy of our state that benefits extend only to those persons who are unemployed through no fault of their own, Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co., 229 Minn. 131, 137 , “fault” includes an act in willful disregard of an employer’s interest.
Lehmann v. Western Airlines, Inc. 188 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1971
Lehmann v. Western Airlines, Inc. 188 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1971
1 Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272; Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 , 34 Minn. L. Rev. 271 ; Ayers v. Nichols, 244 Minn. 375 , 70 N. W. (2d) 296 ; Easthagen v. Naugle-Leck, Inc. 260 Minn. 198 , 109 N. W. (2d) 556 ; Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 267 Minn. 116 , 125 N. W. (2d) 444 ; Koll v. Egekvist Bakeries, Inc. 259 Minn. 287 , 107 N. W. (2d) 373 ; and the m
Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 125 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 1963
Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 125 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 1963
2 Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 ; Di Re v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co. 246 Minn. 279 , 74 N. W. (2d) 518 ; Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 254 Minn. 93 , 93 N. W. (2d) 815 .
Vicker v. Starkey 122 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1963
Vicker v. Starkey 122 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1963
Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 , 34 Minn. L. Rev. 271 ; Oliver Iron Min.
Kitchen v. G. R. Herberger's, Inc. 114 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1962
Kitchen v. G. R. Herberger's, Inc. 114 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1962
Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 .
Stream v. Continental MacHines, Inc. 111 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1961
Stream v. Continental MacHines, Inc. 111 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1961
s governed by the following rule: “*' * * [The supreme court] can only interfere when it appears that the commission has not kept within its jurisdiction, or has proceeded upon an erroneous theory of the law, or unless its action is arbitrary and oppressive and unreasonable so that it represents its will and not its judgment, or is without evidence to support it.” Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131, 136 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223, 227 .
Easthagen v. Naugle-Leck, Inc. 109 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1961
Easthagen v. Naugle-Leck, Inc. 109 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1961
1(6), relating to disqualifications should be construed in line with the legislative intent expressed in § 268.03, Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 ; and that whether an employee’s loss of employment is voluntary or involuntary should be determined by whether the employee exercised a free-will choice and control in the matter, Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co. 258 Minn. 541 , 104 N. W. (2d) 876 .
Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co. 104 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1960
Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co. 104 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1960
In Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131, 142 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223, 230 , this court said: “* * * It is the declared public policy of our state that benefits are intended to extend only to those persons who are unemployed through no fault of their own.” (Italics supplied.)
Capra v. Carpenter Paper Co. 104 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 1960
Overruled Capra v. Carpenter Paper Co. 104 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 1960
The first of these is Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 .
Grushus v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 100 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1960
Grushus v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 100 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1960
*174 No individual shall be required to serve a waiting period of more than one week within the one year period subsequent to filing a valid claim and commencing with the week within which such valid claim was filed.” 4 Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 254 Minn. 93 , 93 N. W. (2d) 815 ; Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131, 142 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223, 230 .
Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 93 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1958
Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 93 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1958
2 Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 .
State ex rel. Duluth Clearing House Ass'n v. Department of Commerce 73 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1955
State ex rel. Duluth Clearing House Ass'n v. Department of Commerce 73 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1955
Hardstone Brick Co. v. Dept. of Commerce, 174 Minn. 200 , ; Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 ; Nyberg v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, Inc. 243 Minn. 361 , 67 N. W. (2d) 821 .
Ayers v. Nichols 70 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1955
Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corporation 70 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1955
Ayers v. Nichols 70 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1955
5 See, Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131, 143 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223, 231 .
Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corporation 70 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1955
Our function, guided by ordinary rules of construction, is to ascertain, if we can, what the legislative intent was and to give effect to it.” *361 For a history and nature of our act, see Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 .
Nyberg v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, Inc. 67 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1954
Nyberg v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, Inc. 67 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1954
6 Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 ; Hamlin v. The Coolerator Co. 227 Minn. 437 , 35 N. W. (2d) 616 ; Bowman v. Troy Launderers & Cleaners, Inc. 215 Minn. 226 , 9 N. W. (2d) 506 ; Ley v. Doherty, 215 Minn. 104 , 9 N. W. (2d) 327 ; State ex rel.
Ackerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 48 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1951
Ackerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 48 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1951
The history and legislative purpose of our unemployment act is discussed in Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 , and Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576 , and we need not repeat what was said there.
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 42 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1950
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 42 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1950
33 Minn. L. Rev. 763 ; Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co. 229 Minn. 131 , 38 N. W. (2d) 223 .