Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Karger v. Wangerin, 40 N.W.2d 846.

26 citing documents.

Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 721 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 721 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co. v. Bird Island Produce, Inc., 249 Minn. 137, 145 , Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114-15
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
2d at 644 (quoting Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114 , ).
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114-15
Alexander v. Holmberg 410 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Alexander v. Holmberg 410 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lehman v. Stout, 261 Minn. 384, 390 , (emphasis added) (quoting Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114 , ).
United Artists Communications, Inc. v. Corporate Property Investors 410 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
United Artists Communications, Inc. v. Corporate Property Investors 410 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114 , (“what was said during the negotiations * * * must be understood to be superseded by the writing, and so much of what was thus said as is not carried forward into the writing must be deemed to have been waived or abandoned”).
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114
San Francisco Real Estate Investors v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of St. Paul 359 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
San Francisco Real Estate Investors v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of St. Paul 359 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110
Ortendahl v. Bergmann 343 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ortendahl v. Bergmann 343 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114-15
Robertson Lumber Co. v. Stephen Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co. 143 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1966
Robertson Lumber Co. v. Stephen Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co. 143 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1966
1 Steward v. Nutrena Feed Mills, Inc. 186 Minn. 606 , ; Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114 , 40 N. W. (2d) 846, 849 ; Lehman v. Stout, 261 Minn. 384, 389 , 112 N. W. (2d) 640, 643 .
Aldrich v. Wilson 120 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1963
Aldrich v. Wilson 120 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1963
The court may also, in its discretion, in like manner, order the owners and persons interested in other tracts than those originally involved to come in and plead, in which case the order shall describe such additional tracts, and state that the purpose of the action is to establish the boundary lines thereof.” 2 Abramson v. Nelson, 263 Minn. 308 , 116 N. W. (2d) 405 ; Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 116 , 40 N. W. (2d) 846, 850 .
Lehman v. Stout 112 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1961
Lehman v. Stout 112 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1961
The rule in Minnesota was succinctly reiterated by Mr. Justice Peterson in Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110, 114 , 40 N. W. (2d) 846, 849 , in this manner: “The rule has become mere hornbook law that, where parties have reduced their contract to writing, the contract may not be proved by prior or contemporaneous utterances or writings and that these are entirely immaterial for the purpose of determining what the terms of th
Gartner v. Gartner 74 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1956
Gartner v. Gartner 74 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1956
Co. 114 Minn. 49 , ; Johnson v. Benham, 163 Minn. 31 , ; Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110 , 40 N. W. (2d) 846 ; Johnson v. Giese, 231 Minn. 258 , 42 N. W. (2d) 712 .
Sagl v. Hirt 52 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1952
Sagl v. Hirt 52 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1952
Karger v. Wangerin, 230 Minn. 110 , 40 N. W. (2d) 846 ; Seifert v. Mutual Benefit L. Ins.