DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 21 N.W.2d 792.

28 citing documents.

  • Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
  • Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
  • Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
    In State v. Oman, 261 Minn. 10 , we gave authority to the criteria articulated by Chief Justice Charles Loring in his dissenting opinion in State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 246, 265
  • State v. Loge 608 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Morrow 492 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Morrow 492 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    Although this court is bound by the decisions of the United States Supreme Court when interpreting the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, when interpreting the Minnesota Constitution, “[w]e should exercise our own judicial judgment as to what we deem a violation of our own constitution.” State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 246, 265 , quoted in State v. Oman, 261 Minn. 10, 21 , -23 (1961).
  • STATE, CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Ellis 441 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • STATE, CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Ellis 441 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 246, 253
  • Matter of Schroeder 415 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Matter of Schroeder 415 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    E.g., Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co., 262 Minn. 60, 61 , State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 246, 255
  • In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    See, e.g., State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 246
  • State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson 305 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1981
  • State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson 305 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1981
    E. g., Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co., 262 Minn. 60, 61 , State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 246, 255
  • Kelsey v. State 283 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1979
  • City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters 276 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1979
  • City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters 276 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1979
    E. g., Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co., 262 Minn. 60, 61 , State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 246, 255
  • State v. Reps 223 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Reps 223 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1974
    State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co. 221 Minn. 246 , State v. Brattrud, 210 Minn. 214 , , 134 A. L. R. 1248 (1941).
  • Holmen v. Miller 206 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1973
  • Twin City Candy and Tobacco Co. v. A. Weisman Co. 149 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1967
  • Twin City Candy and Tobacco Co. v. A. Weisman Co. 149 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1967
    Plaintiff argues that the Minnesota case which governs is State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co. 221 Minn. 246 , 21 N. W. (2d) 792 , 163 A. L. R. 1108, in which a divided court sustained a statute prohibiting discrimination in the purchase of farm products without reference to intent or effect.
  • Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co. 113 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1962
  • Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co. 113 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1962
    2 State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co. 221 Minn. 246, 255 , 21 N. W. (2d) 792, 796 ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Oman 110 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1961
  • State v. Oman 110 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1961
    In State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co. 221 Minn. 246, 265 , 21 N. W. (2d) 792, 800 , 163 A. L. R. 1108, 1119, Mr. Chief Justice Loring stated in his dissenting opinion: “* * * When we apply our state due process clause, we are not bound to follow any interpretive relaxation of the inhibitions of the Fourteenth Amendment made by the Supreme Court of the United States.
  • State v. O'HERON 83 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1957
  • State v. O'HERON 83 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1957
    1 See, State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co. 221 Minn. 246 , 21 N. W. (2d) 792 , 163 A. L. R. 1108; 5 Dunnell, Dig.