Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 27 N.W.2d 555.

50 citing documents.

Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Dahl v. Northwestern Nat’l Bank of Mpls., 265 Minn. 216, 220 , (discussing Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 534 , ), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 533 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1995
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 533 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1995
Kronzer v. First National Bank of Minneapolis, 305 Minn. 415 , Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526
VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
VanWagner derives his theory of absolute liability from Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , and its progeny.
Lubbers v. Anderson 524 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lubbers v. Anderson 524 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 532
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 582
Iacona v. Schrupp 509 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Iacona v. Schrupp 509 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 535
Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. Huber 465 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1991
Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. Huber 465 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1991
Compare Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 535-40 , -62 (1947) (no absolute liability because statute prohibiting sale of adulterated kerosene was not to protect a limited class); with Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 140 , (violation of statute prohibiting sale of glue to minors creates absolute liability).
Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
See, Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 140-41 , Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 535
Del E. Webb v. Superior Court of Arizona 726 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1986
Thelen Ex Rel. Thelen v. St. Cloud Hospital 379 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thelen Ex Rel. Thelen v. St. Cloud Hospital 379 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the court held that contributory negligence was available as a defense to a negligence action based on violation of a statute regulating the sale and delivery of volatile oils.
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
The doctrine of absolute liability was recognized before enactment of the comparative negligence statute with reference to negligence per se in Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526
Hage v. Stade 304 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1981
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc. 260 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1977
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc. 260 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1977
543 (1889); Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Lorshbough v. Township of Buzzle 258 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1977
Lorshbough v. Township of Buzzle 258 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1977
See, Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 532
Scott v. Independent School District No. 709 256 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1977
Scott v. Independent School District No. 709 256 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1977
Restatement, Torts 2d § 483, Comment c. See, generally, Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526
Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
See, also, Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101 , Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526
Zerby v. Warren 210 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1973
Zerby v. Warren 210 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1973
The nature of tort liability created by a statutory violation was con *139 sidered in the leading case of Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526
Travelers Insurance v. Iron Ranges Natural Gas Co. 183 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1971
Travelers Insurance v. Iron Ranges Natural Gas Co. 183 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1971
They argue that safety statutes not specifically limited by their terms — such as factory acts — are generally enacted for the benefit of every member of the public who is exposed to injury or loss by a violation, citing Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555 , which was an action for the death of a purchaser of an explosive mixture of gasoline and kerosene sold in violation of statute wherein we held that the protection of the statute should not be limited to users.
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of Hewitt 143 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1966
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of Hewitt 143 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1966
The cases showing what type of violation of statute will bar a defense of contributory negligence and the converse are exhaustively reviewed in Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555 , 171 A. L. R. 885, 32 Minn. L. Rev. 105 , and we need not repeat what we said there.
Nelson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 108 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1961
Nelson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 108 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1961
1 See, Prosser, Contributory Negligence as Defense to Violation of Statute, 32 Minn. L. Rev. 105; Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555 , 171 A. L. R. 885, where many of our cases are collected.
Cayse v. Foley Brothers, Inc. 96 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1959
Cayse v. Foley Brothers, Inc. 96 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1959
Co. 234 Minn. 280 , 48 N. W. (2d) 431 ; Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555 , 171 A. L. R. 885; DeVere v. Parten, 222 Minn. 211 , 23 N. W. (2d) 584 ; Gibbons v. Gooding, 153 Minn. 225 , ; Kelly v. Theo.
Chapman ex rel. Chapman v. Carlson 85 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1957
Chapman ex rel. Chapman v. Carlson 85 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1957
Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555 , 171 A. L. R. 885; Prosser, Contributory Negligence as Defense to Violation of Statute, 32 Minn. L. Rev. 105 .
Lavalle Ex Rel. Lavalle v. Kaupp 61 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1953
Lavalle Ex Rel. Lavalle v. Kaupp 61 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1953
6 See, Hutchinson v. Cotton, 236 Minn. 366 , 53 N. W. (2d) 27 , 31 A. L. R. (2d) 1465; Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555 , 171 A. L. R. 885; Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , .
Hutchinson v. Cotton 53 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1952
Hutchinson v. Cotton 53 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1952
Bank, 236 Minn. 123 , 52 N. W. (2d) 718 ; Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555 , 171 A. L. R. 885; 19 Minn. L. Rev. 667 , and cases cited.
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Danberry 48 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1951
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Danberry 48 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1951
Dart v. Pure Oil CO. 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555 , 171 A. L. R. 885.
Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
As said in Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526, 533 , 27 N. W. (2d) 555, 559 , 171 A. L. R. 885, quoting from Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103, 105 , , 12 A. S. R. 698: *160 “* * * Negligence is the breach of legal duty.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by