Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Seward v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co., 25 N.W.2d 221.
- Orwick v. Belshan 231 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1975
- Orwick v. Belshan 231 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1975
- Hughes v. Keller 224 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1974
-
Hughes v. Keller
224 N.W.2d 738
Minn. 1974
222 Minn. 454 , Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75
- Cahill v. Peterson 151 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1967
-
Cahill v. Peterson
151 N.W.2d 258
Minn. 1967
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 ; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 .
- Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
-
Larson v. Montpetit
147 N.W.2d 580
Minn. 1966
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 .
- Pedersen v. Jirsa 125 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1963
-
Pedersen v. Jirsa
125 N.W.2d 38
Minn. 1963
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 .
- Gardner v. Germain 117 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1962
-
Gardner v. Germain
117 N.W.2d 759
Minn. 1962
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 .
- Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. 96 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1959
-
Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.
96 N.W.2d 195
Minn. 1959
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 ; 13 Dunnell, Dig.
- Meyer v. Mitchell 80 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1957
-
Meyer v. Mitchell
80 N.W.2d 450
Minn. 1957
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 , and Rivera v. Mandsager, 228 Minn. 227 , 36 N. W. (2d) 700 .
- Cook v. Person 74 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1956
-
Cook v. Person
74 N.W.2d 389
Minn. 1956
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 .
- Ferguson v. Kehoe 71 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1955
-
Ferguson v. Kehoe
71 N.W.2d 168
Minn. 1955
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 ; Schmanski v. Church of St.
- Knox v. City of Granite Falls 72 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1955
-
Knox v. City of Granite Falls
72 N.W.2d 67
Minn. 1955
Co. 222 Minn. 454, 459 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221, 224 , to the effect that the use of the phrase “less care” might be misunderstood as requiring a lower standard of care.
- Standafer v. First National Bank 52 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1952
-
Standafer v. First National Bank
52 N.W.2d 718
Minn. 1952
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 ; Christianson v. C. St.
- Mickelson v. Kernkamp 42 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1950
- Carlson v. Fredsall 37 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1949
-
Carlson v. Fredsall
37 N.W.2d 744
Minn. 1949
Co. 222 Minn. 454, 457 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221, 223 , we disapproved of the “material element or substantial factor” theory of proximate cause.
- Benson v. Hoenig 37 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1949
-
Benson v. Hoenig
37 N.W.2d 422
Minn. 1949
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 ; and Robinson v. Butler, 226 Minn. 491 , 33 N. W. (2d) 821 .
- Rivera v. Mandsager 36 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1949
-
Rivera v. Mandsager
36 N.W.2d 700
Minn. 1949
Co. 222 Minn. 454, 457, 459 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221, 223, 224 , in charging under the facts of that case that plaintiff’s act of parking a truck was as a matter of law a proximate cause of his injuries, we said: “The error in the instruction of the court below was emphasized by its use of the ‘material element or substantial factor’ theory
- Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
-
Barrett v. Nash Finch Co.
36 N.W.2d 526
Minn. 1949
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) *161 221; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 .
- Knight v. Powers Dry Goods Co. Inc. 30 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 1948
-
Knight v. Powers Dry Goods Co. Inc.
30 N.W.2d 536
Minn. 1948
Co. 222 Minn. 454 , 25 N. W. (2d) 221 , adherence to this rule was stated.