Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 23 N.W.2d 362.

75 citing documents.

Michael Fosness, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The two essential elements are “possession and part payment.” d 362, 368 (Minn. 1946).
First & First, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Chadco of Duluth, LLC, a Minnesota ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
First & First, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Chadco of Duluth, LLC, a Minnesota ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(reasoning that in a dispute regarding an interest in land, monetary damages are presumed to be inadequate); (holding that the district court acted within its discretion in awarding specific performance even where other remedies would be
Whitefish Enterprises, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minnesota law views land as unique when compared to other types of property; equitable relief may not be available if monetary damages are adequate to compensate fo r most types of property, but “special status [is] accorded to land as distinguished from other forms of property.” Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo , (“[D]amages for the breach of a contract for the sale and purchase of any interest in land is always considered inadequate, without regard to the size, value or location of the land .
Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo , 222 Minn. 141 , , 368 (1946).
Doran Development, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 147-48, -67 (1946).
Corrine M. Fingalson v. George A. Carlson and Jeanette D. Carlson, individually and as trustees under the Carlson … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Corrine M. Fingalson v. George A. Carlson and Jeanette D. Carlson, individually and as trustees under the Carlson … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 146-47, (noting that partial performance in reliance on an oral contract may take a contract out of the statute of frauds).
James F. Christie v. Estate of Dilman Christie, Charles Christie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James F. Christie v. Estate of Dilman Christie, Charles Christie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 147, (noting that part performance occurred when a purchaser took possession of land under an oral contract and made partial payment of the purchase price in reliance on the vendor-vendee relationship that existed between the parties); Bresnahan v. Bresnahan, 71 Minn. 1, 6, 73 N.W.
Schmitz v. RINKE, NOONAN 783 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Schmitz v. RINKE, NOONAN 783 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 150
Hempel v. Creek House Trust 743 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Hempel v. Creek House Trust 743 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
And even when the right ripens into an option to purchase the subject property it remains “only a right in personam to buy at his election.” Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 145
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1998
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1998
See Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190, 161 N.W.
Lilyerd v. Carlson 478 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Lilyerd v. Carlson 478 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 150
Schumacher v. Ihrke 469 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Schumacher v. Ihrke 469 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 150
W.M., R.W., & T.R. Bowler v. TMG Partnership 357 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
W.M., R.W., & T.R. Bowler v. TMG Partnership 357 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141
Hilltop Development v. Miller Hill Manor Co. 342 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1984
Hilltop Development v. Miller Hill Manor Co. 342 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1984
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 146
Matter of City of Shakopee 295 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1980
Matter of City of Shakopee 295 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1980
See Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 146 , 91 C.J.S.
Malevich v. Hakola 278 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1979
Malevich v. Hakola 278 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1979
See, Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , *544 , 166 A.L.R.
M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. Mormann 271 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1978
M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. Mormann 271 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1978
See Wurdemann v. Hjelm, 257 Minn. 450 , Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 8A Thompson on Real Property § 4444 (replacement 1963); 20 Dunnell, Dig.
C. W. Stark Lumber Co. v. Sether 257 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1977
C. W. Stark Lumber Co. v. Sether 257 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1977
See, Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 145
Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp. 246 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1976
Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp. 246 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1976
4 It would appear that our decision in Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , where it is held that a contract conferring an option to purchase land, because it conveys no interest in land, is not within the statute of frauds, would be sufficient answer to the disposition in the trial court.
Duffy v. Park Terrace Supper Club, Inc. 206 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1973
Duffy v. Park Terrace Supper Club, Inc. 206 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1973
Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141
Husbyn v. Lunde 166 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1969
Husbyn v. Lunde 166 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1969
Alsdorf v. Svoboda, supra; In re Estate of LeBorius, supra; Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A. L. R. 435.
Formanek v. Langton 134 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1965
Formanek v. Langton 134 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1965
Camenker v. Greene, 251 Minn. 106 , 86 N. W. (2d) 708 ; Johnson v. Quaal, 250 Minn. 154 , 83 N. W. (2d) 796 ; Holste v. Baker, 223 Minn. 321 , 26 N. W. (2d) 473 ; Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A. L. R. 435; Biddle v. Whitmore, 134 Minn. 68 , .
Wurdemann v. Hjelm 102 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1960
Wurdemann v. Hjelm 102 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1960
We held to the contrary in Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 145 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362, 365 , 166 A. L. R. 435, where we said that a contract conferring an option to purchase vests in the optionee “only a right in personam to buy at his election.” A contract of sale, on the other hand, must be bilateral in its obligation and if the contract binds one party to sell and the other
Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. Louis 98 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1959
Tjanetopoulos v. Margares 98 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1959
Tjanetopoulos v. Margares 98 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1959
On the contrary, its enforcement will result in substantial justice being done.” See, also, Burke v. Fine, 236 Minn. 52 , 51 N. W. (2d) 818 ; Goette v. Howe, 232 Minn. 168 , 44 N. W. (2d) 734 ; Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A. L. R. 435.
Camenker v. Greene 86 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1957
Camenker v. Greene 86 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1957
In Shaughnessy v. Eids *110 mo, 222 Minn. 141 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362 , 166 A. L. R. 435, we held that the taking of possession by the purchaser, acting under an oral contract for the transfer of an interest in land, coupled with the making of part payment of the purchase price, in reliance upon and with unequivocal reference to the vendor-vendee relationship, withou
Johnson v. Quaal 83 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1957
Johnson v. Quaal 83 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1957
9 As we said in Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141, 151 , 23 N. W. (2d) 362, 368 , “The entire record * * * is pregnant with indications of a dominant intent of the parties from the inception of their transaction” that the relationship between them was that of vendor and vendee.