Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Village of Newport v. Taylor, 30 N.W.2d 588.

86 citing documents.

Phillips v. Blowers 161 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1968
Phillips v. Blowers 161 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1968
740, 742 , must be “clear, positive, and unequivocal.” We said in Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299, 303 , 30 N.W.
Rein v. Town of Spring Lake 145 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
Rein v. Town of Spring Lake 145 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
Appellant cites Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , , and other cases [1] as controlling.
Rein v. Town of Spring Lake 145 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
Rein v. Town of Spring Lake 145 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
Appellant cites Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 , and other cases 1 *83 as controlling.
Miller v. Martin 106 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1960
Miller v. Martin 106 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1960
541.02; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson, 232 Minn. 152 , 44 N. W. (2d) 775 ; Engquist v. Wirtjes, 243 Minn. 502 , 68 N. W. (2d) 412 .
Stein v. Town Board 99 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1959
In Re Stein to Register Title to Land 256 Minn. 485 Minn. 1959
In Re Stein to Register Title to Land 256 Minn. 485 Minn. 1959
Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N.W.
Stein v. Town Board 99 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1959
Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 .
Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; St.
City of Fergus Falls v. Whitlock 77 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1956
City of Fergus Falls v. Whitlock 77 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1956
If this contention is predicated upon the claim that Sherman Street has been abandoned by the city, the case of Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299, 305 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588, 592 , is sufficient answer, for it was there held: “* * * An intention to abandon is not established by negative or equivocal acts.
Gifford v. Vore 72 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1955
Gifford v. Vore 72 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1955
Fishman v. Nielsen, supra; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Engquist v. Wirtjes 68 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1955
Engquist v. Wirtjes 68 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1955
3 Fishman v. Nielsen, 237 Minn. 1 , 53 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Fishman v. Nielsen 53 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1952
Fishman v. Nielsen 53 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1952
Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , and note 2, 30 N. W. (2d) 588 , and note 1.
Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson 44 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson 44 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; Simpson v. Sheridan, 231 Minn. 118 , 42 N. W. (2d) 402 .
Simpson v. Sheridan 42 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1950
Simpson v. Sheridan 42 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1950
In Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299, 303 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588, 591 , we said: * * adverse possession may be established only by clear and positive proof based on a strict construction of the evidence, without resort to any inference or presumption in favor of the disseizor, but with the indulgence of every presumption against him.
Bryant v. Gustafson 40 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1950
Bryant v. Gustafson 40 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1950
(See, Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. [2d] 588, and cases there cited.)
Alstad v. Boyer 37 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1949
Alstad v. Boyer 37 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1949
Defendant asserts, however, that under Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 , adverse possession must be established by clear and positive proof without resort to any inference or presumption in favor of the disseizor.
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Marcks 36 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1949
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Marcks 36 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1949
See, Pierro v. City of Minneapolis, 139 Minn. 394 , ; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 .
Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
Plaintiffs in effect contend that of the five essential elements of' adverse possession, that it must be hostile, open, actual, continuous, and exclusive (Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299, 303 , 30 N. W. [2d] 588, 591), two thereof — that it must be hostile and continuous — are absent here.
Mitchell v. City of St. Paul 31 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1948
Mitchell v. City of St. Paul 31 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1948
It might be said that whatever rights defendants acquired under the condemnation proceedings and the deed were not lost by nonusage or abandonment, under the recent decision of Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 , where authorities are cited.