Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Coller v. City of St. Paul, 26 N.W.2d 835.

51 citing documents.

Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 385
Rochon Corp. v. City of Saint Paul 814 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Rochon Corp. v. City of Saint Paul 814 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 389 , (“Failure to comply with requirements of the charter as to competitive bidding compels decision that the bid, the attempted modification of it, and the award of the contract on the bid as modified were void.”); Gale v. City of St.
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 790 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2010
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 790 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2010
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 378 , -37 (1947).
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 769 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 769 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 387 , see also Dean B. Thomson, 1 et al., A Critique of Best Value Contracting in Minnesota, 34 Wm.
Transit Team, Inc. v. Metropolitan Council 679 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Transit Team, Inc. v. Metropolitan Council 679 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 387-88
Queen City Construction, Inc. v. City of Rochester 604 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Queen City Construction, Inc. v. City of Rochester 604 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 384-85 , and that “the specifications must be so drawn as to give all bidders an equal opportunity without granting an advantage to one or placing others at a disadvantage.” Foley Bros. v. Marshall, 266 Minn. 259, 264
Lovering-Johnson, Inc. v. City of Prior Lake 558 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lovering-Johnson, Inc. v. City of Prior Lake 558 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 387
Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of Minneapolis 438 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of Minneapolis 438 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The bid “must conform substantially to the advertised plans and specifications, and that where there is a substantial variance between the bid and the plans and specifications it is the plain duty of the public authority to reject the bid.” Cotter v. City of Saint Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 384 , 26 N.W.
Schwandt Sanitation of Paynesville v. City of Paynesville 423 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Schwandt Sanitation of Paynesville v. City of Paynesville 423 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 387
Telephone Associates Inc. v. St. Louis County Board 350 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Telephone Associates Inc. v. St. Louis County Board 350 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , which states: “a bid must conform substantially to the advertised-plans and specifications, and that where there is a substantial variance between the bid and the plans and specifications it is the plain duty of the public authority to reject the bid.” Id.
Johnson v. City of Jordan 352 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Johnson v. City of Jordan 352 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 387
R. E. Short Co. v. City of Minneapolis 269 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1978
R. E. Short Co. v. City of Minneapolis 269 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1978
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 387 , : “ * * * The very purpose of requiring competitive bidding is to divest the officials having the power to let contracts of discretion in some respects and to limit its exercise in others.
Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of Stuntz 257 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1977
Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of Stuntz 257 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1977
Village of Excelsior v. FW Pearce Corporation 226 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1975
Village of Excelsior v. FW Pearce Corporation 226 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1975
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , Casey v. Central Elec.
Electronics Unlimited, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville 182 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1971
Otter Tail Power Company v. MacKichan 133 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1965
Otter Tail Power Company v. MacKichan 133 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1965
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835 .
Gephart v. Hospital Facility Building Commission 132 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1965
Gephart v. Hospital Facility Building Commission 132 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1965
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 387, 389 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835, 841, 842 ; Ambrozich v. City of Eveleth, 200 Minn. 473, 481 , ; 112 A. L. R. 269; Diamond v. City of Mankato, 89 Minn. 48, 53 , , 61 L. R. A. 448.
Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Marshall 123 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1963
Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Marshall 123 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1963
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 384 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835, 840 , where we said: “Statutory and city charter provisions requiring competitive bidding in the letting of public contracts require, as necessary corollaries, that the public officials whose duty it is to let a contract should adopt definite plans and specifications with respect to the subje
Leskinen v. Pucelj 115 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1962
Leskinen v. Pucelj 115 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1962
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835 ; Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 .
Gale v. City of St. Paul 96 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1959
Gale v. City of St. Paul 96 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1959
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835 .
Nielsen v. City of St. Paul 88 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1958
Nielsen v. City of St. Paul 88 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1958
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835 .
Griswold v. County of Ramsey 65 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1954
Griswold v. County of Ramsey 65 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1954
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 387 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835, 841 ; 43 Am.
Duffy v. Village of Princeton 60 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1953
Duffy v. Village of Princeton 60 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1953
Paul, 223 Minn. 376, 385 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835, 840 ; City of Bemidji v. Ervin, 204 Minn. 90 , ; 43 Am.
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake 49 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1951
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake 49 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1951
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835 .
Sutton v. City of St. Paul 48 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1951
Sutton v. City of St. Paul 48 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1951
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835 , that within narrow discretionary limits the city must accept the bid of the lowest responsible bidder on equipment such as here contemplated.
City of St. Paul v. Dual Parking Meter Co. 39 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1949