Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Willoughby v. Utecht, 27 N.W.2d 779.

48 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 859 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 859 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2015
Moreover, the district court may conduct an evidentiary hearing with the petitioner and Commissioner present to offer evidence and testimony that will provide a record for the district court’s decision.6 See Schwartz, d at 141 n.3; Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572, 575, (“Controverted questions of fact in habeas corpus proceedings must be proved the same as in other legal proceedings.”).
State Ex Rel. Gray v. Tahash 156 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1968
State Ex Rel. Gray v. Tahash 156 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1968
May v. Swenson, 242 Minn. 570 , 65 N. W. (2d) 657 ; Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535.
State Ex Rel. Hartmann v. Lund 152 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1967
State Ex Rel. Hartmann v. Lund 152 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1967
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535.
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash 139 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1965
Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465, 466 , : “* * * [T]he prisoner is not entitled to a discharge on habeas corpus until he has fully performed so much of the sentence as the court had power to impose.” The overall limitations on the scope of the remedy afforded by habeas corpus, often repeated in our decisions, is well summarized in Willough-by v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572, 578 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779, 783 , 171 A. L. R. 535, 539: *469 “* * * Because the sentence is a judgment, the rules applicable to colla
State Ex Rel. Anderson v. United States Veterans Hospital 128 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1964
State Ex Rel. Anderson v. United States Veterans Hospital 128 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1964
3 In Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572, 575 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779, 781 , 171 A. L. R. 535, this court said: “Allegations in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the traverse of the return thereto and unsworn statements at the hearing on a writ and in a brief do not constitute proof of facts which they assert.
State Ex Rel. Becker v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1963
State Ex Rel. Becker v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1963
5 Breeding v. Utecht, 239 Minn. 137 , 59 N. W. (2d) 314 ; Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535.
State Ex Rel. Hines v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1962
State Ex Rel. Hines v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1962
5 Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535.
State ex rel. Hoffman v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1962
State ex rel. Hoffman v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1962
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572, 579 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Morris v. Tahash 115 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1962
State Ex Rel. Morris v. Tahash 115 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1962
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Dombroske v. Tahash 114 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1962
State ex rel. Dombroske v. Tahash 114 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1962
Flynn v. Rigg, 256 Minn. 304 , 98 N. W. (2d) 79 ; Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535.
State Ex Rel. Munnell v. Rigg 110 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. Munnell v. Rigg 110 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1961
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; Kubus v. Swenson, 242 Minn. 425 , 65 N. W. (2d) 177 , certiorari denied, 348 U. S. 877 , 75 S. Ct. 114 , 99 L. ed. 690; State ex rel.
State v. Castle 109 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1961
State v. Castle 109 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1961
In Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535, we held that the validity of a prior sentence could not be collaterally attacked upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Flynn v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1959
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572, 578 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779, 783 , 171 A. L. R. 535, 539 to 540; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Flynn v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
1 Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Shelby v. Rigg 96 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Shelby v. Rigg 96 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1959
Schwanke v. Utecht, 233 Minn. 434 , 47 N. W. (2d) 99 ; Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1958
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; Stolpestad v. Utecht, 231 Minn. 266 , 42 N. W. (2d) 813 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. May v. Swenson 65 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1954
State Ex Rel. May v. Swenson 65 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1954
Controverted questions of fact in habeas corpus proceedings must be proved the same as in other legal proceedings.” Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572, 575 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779, 781 , 171 A. L. R. 535.
State Ex Rel. Richter v. Swenson 63 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1954
State Ex Rel. Richter v. Swenson 63 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1954
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572, 579 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779, 784 , 171 A. L. R. 535, where we said: “* * * It makes no difference in this connection that defendant committed the prior crime and was convicted thereof in a state other than the one where the second crime was committed for which increased punishment is meted out because of the prior convic
Dixon v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 926 Minn. 1954
Dixon v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 926 Minn. 1954
MacMillen v. Utecht, 221 Minn. 138 , 21 N. W. (2d) 239 ; Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535.
Breeding v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1954
Breeding v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1954
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; State ex rel.
Breeding v. Utecht 59 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1953
Breeding v. Utecht 59 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1953
3 Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; State ex rel.
Shaw v. Utecht 43 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1950
Shaw v. Utecht 43 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1950
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572, 579 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Perkins v. Utecht 43 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1950
State Ex Rel. Perkins v. Utecht 43 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1950
It is the contention of petitioner that his plea of guilty to the specific charge of three prior convictions is ineffective, since it cannot be determined therefrom the nature of the prior convictions, and that such defects, being apparent on the judgment, are within the challenge of the present petition for a writ of habeas corpus under the rule set forth in Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535.
Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. Lang 41 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1950
Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. Lang 41 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1950
Willoughby v. Utecht, 223 Minn. 572 , 27 N. W. (2d) 779 , 171 A. L. R. 535.