DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kapla v. Lehti, 30 N.W.2d 685.

41 citing documents.

  • Veld v. Steffl 363 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Veld v. Steffl 363 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325, 334-35
  • Rome v. Rome 239 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1976
  • Rome v. Rome 239 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1976
    2 See, also, Hinman v. Gould, 205 Minn. 377 , (could have seen car which began skidding at 300 feet, saw it in wrong lane at 85 feet, issue of negligence a jury question); Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , (saw at 50 to 100 feet, jury question) ; Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , (could have seen at 1,400 feet, saw at 60 feet, jury question); Coble v. Lacey, 252 *210 Minn. 423, 431, (“Even though Tina Larson had negligently entered the north lane of the highway upon which Lacey was traveling, he w
  • Hovey Ex Rel. Corporon v. Wagoner 177 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1970
  • Monson v. Matheson 140 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1966
  • Monson v. Matheson 140 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1966
    tion here involved, these authorities are relevant and helpful: Brady v. Kroll, 244 Minn. 525 , 70 N. W. (2d) 354 ; McCormick v. Malecha, 266 Minn. 33 , 122 N. W. (2d) 446 ; Cook v. Person, 246 Minn. 119 , 74 N. W. (2d) 389 ; Kime v. Koch, 227 Minn. 372 , 35 N. W. (2d) 534 ; Stedman v. Norlin, 243 Minn. 389 , 68 N. W. (2d) 393 ; Cosgrove v. McGonagle, 196 Minn. 6 , ; Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 ; and Barrie v. Ackerman, 250 Minn. 1 , 83 N. W. (2d) 497 .
  • Daigle v. Twin City Ready Mix Concrete Co. 128 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1964
  • Daigle v. Twin City Ready Mix Concrete Co. 128 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1964
    Here the court’s instruction gave cognizance to the rules governing contributory negligence and proximate cause which met with this court’s approval in Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 .
  • Boraas v. Carlson 127 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1964
  • Boraas v. Carlson 127 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1964
    Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N. W. (2d) 883 , 175 A. L. R. 1007; Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 ; see, also, O’Connor v. Chicago, M. St.
  • Capriotti v. Beck 117 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1962
  • Capriotti v. Beck 117 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1962
    Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 ; Pratschner v. Electric Short Line Ry.
  • Waldstein v. Amann 208 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1961
  • Waldstein v. Amann 208 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1961
    “Failure by such person driving on his own side of the road, as aforesaid to exercise such due care, in avoiding a collision, if you find that he faded to exercise such due care, constitutes negligence on the part of such driver and bars his recovery rights.” He cites Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 , and Coble v. Lacey, 252 Minn. 423 , 90 N. W. (2d) 314 , in support of his position.
  • Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
  • Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
    They therefore cite Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 ; Sims v. Hallett Const. Co. 247 Minn. 339 , 77 N. W. (2d) 54 ; and Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 , as cases supporting their contentions.
  • Coble v. Lacey 90 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1958
  • Coble v. Lacey 90 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1958
    In Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325, 334 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685, 691 , this court said: “In numerous of our decisions we have held that the driver of an automobile on his own right side of the road must exercise due care to avoid collisions with other vehicles, even with those on his side of the road, and that, while he may assume that an approaching vehic
  • Link v. Leichtnam 90 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1958
  • Link v. Leichtnam 90 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1958
    See, Barrie v. Ackerman, 250 Minn. 1 , 83 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Katlaba v. Pfeifer, 238 Minn. 298 , 56 N. W. (2d) 725 ; Kime v. Koch, 227 Minn. 372 , 35 N. W. (2d) 534 ; Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 , and cases cited therein.
  • Frank v. Stiegler 84 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1957
  • Frank v. Stiegler 84 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1957
    The plaintiff-respondent relies on Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 , to support her contention that the trial court’s instruction on concurrent negligence was not erroneous.
  • Barrie Ex Rel. Barrie v. Ackerman Ex Rel. Koppi 83 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1957
  • Barrie Ex Rel. Barrie v. Ackerman Ex Rel. Koppi 83 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1957
    1 In Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325, 334 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685, 691 , where many of the cases on this subject are collected, we said: “In numerous of our decisions we have held that the driver of an automobile on his own right side of the road must exercise due care to avoid collisions with other vehicles, even with those on his side of the road, and that
  • Borris v. Lewis 73 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1955
  • Borris v. Lewis 73 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1955
    Ample support therefor may be found in the following authorities: Olson v. Olson, 238 Minn. 102 , 55 N. W. (2d) 706 ; Gordon v. Pappas, 227 Minn. 95 , 34 N. W. (2d) 293 ; Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 .
  • Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
  • Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
    Cameron v. Evans, supra; Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 ; Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , ; Sankiewicz v. Speckel, 209 Minn. 528 , ; Kivak v. G. N. Ry.
  • Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
  • Simon v. Carroll 62 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1954
  • Simon v. Carroll 62 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1954
    Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 .
  • Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
    5 Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 ; Klingman v. Loew’s Incorporated, 209 Minn. 449 , ; Sankiewicz v. Speckel, 209 Minn. 528 , ; Kivak v. G. N. Ry.
  • Katlaba v. Pfeifer 56 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1953
  • Katlaba v. Pfeifer 56 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1953
    See, Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325, 334 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685, 691 ; 35 Minn. L. Rev. 357 , 366, 367.
  • Rutz v. Iacono 40 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1949
  • Rutz v. Iacono 40 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1949
    449 ; Shockman v. Union Transfer Co. 220 Minn. 334 , ; Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , .
  • Rue v. Wendland 33 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
  • Rue v. Wendland 33 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
    2); that an approaching car on the wronside of the road will turn onto the right side in time to pass safely (Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. [2d] 685); that an automobile will stop or park on the shoulder parallel to and on its right (his left) side of the road (§ 169.35); that an automobile parked on the shoulder will not only be on its right shoulder, but that, because such a car is required to dim its lights, it will not have its lights on br
  • Moan v. Aasen 31 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1948
  • Moan v. Aasen 31 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1948
    Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 ; Olson v. Byam, 176 Minn. 619 , .