Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Enderson v. Kelehan, 32 N.W.2d 286.

48 citing documents.

Teresa M. Hintze, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
4 Surface water includes “waters from rain, springs, or melting snow which lie or flow on the surface of the earth, but which do not form part of a well-defined body of water or natural watercourse.” -89 (Minn. 1948).
James Aeshliman, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Carol Quinn v. William G. Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Carol Quinn v. William G. Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“‘Surface waters’ consist of waters from rain, springs, or melting snow which lie or flow on the surface of the earth, but which do not form part of a well-defined body of water or natural watercourse.” Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 167, -90 (1948).
Jovani Nassar v. Fady Chamoun Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jovani Nassar v. Fady Chamoun Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The reasonable-use doctrine balances the benefits “to the land drained” with the harms to the neighboring property “receiving the burden.” Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 168
Wear v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District 621 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Wear v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District 621 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 169 , -90 (1948) (involving surface drainage rights).
Kral v. Boesch 557 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Kral v. Boesch 557 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 169 , -90 (1948) (involving surface drainage rights).
Evers v. Willaby 444 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Evers v. Willaby 444 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 167-68
Quist v. Kroening 410 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Quist v. Kroening 410 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 167 , -89 (1948) (footnote omitted).
Wellens v. Thuening 393 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wellens v. Thuening 393 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Specifically, appellants assert that the court failed to balance the benefits accruing to respondent from the drainage system against the harm resulting to the appellants, as required in Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 168
Hunt v. Estate of Hanson 356 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hunt v. Estate of Hanson 356 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“Minnesota follows the ‘rule of reasonable use with regard to diversion or obstruction of surface water.” Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 167-168
Duevel v. Jennissen 352 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Duevel v. Jennissen 352 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 167-68 , ().
Wilson v. Ramacher 352 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
Wilson v. Ramacher 352 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
See, e.g., Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163
Highview North Apartments v. County of Ramsey 323 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1982
Miles v. City of Oakdale 323 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1982
Miles v. City of Oakdale 323 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1982
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , (involving surface drainage rights)
Highview North Apartments v. County of Ramsey 323 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1982
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163
Lahman v. Commissioner of Highways 282 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1979
Lahman v. Commissioner of Highways 282 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1979
See, Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163
Pell v. Nelson 201 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1972
Pell v. Nelson 201 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1972
Sheehan v. Flynn, 59 Minn. 436 , Krupke v. Stockard, 103 Minn. 349 , Erhard v. Wagner, 104 Minn. 258 , Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , Collins v. Wickland, 251 Minn. 419 , Kallevig v. Holmgren, 293 Minn. 193
Kallevig v. Holmgren 197 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1972
Kallevig v. Holmgren 197 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1972
“Yes Answer yes or no” 3 See, also, Sachs v. Chiat, 281 Minn. 540 , Johnson v. Agerbeck, 247 Minn. 432 , Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , Collins v. Wickland, 251 Minn. 419 , Kinyon & McClure, Interferences with Surface Waters, 24 Minn. L. Rev. 891 , 904; 1 Clark, Waters and Water Rights, § 52.1(A).
Sachs v. Chiat 162 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1968
Sachs v. Chiat 162 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1968
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163, 168 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286, 289 .
Naftalin v. John Wood Company 116 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1962
Naftalin v. John Wood Company 116 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1962
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286 .
Renneke v. County of Brown 97 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1959
Renneke v. County of Brown 97 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1959
and squarely met all the issues raised by appellants and rendered its decision accordingly; that although there was a conflict in the evidence it presented a fact issue; that the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the *247 findings; and that such findings will not be disturbed on appeal unless they are manifestly contrary to the evidence as a whole, citing Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286 .
Collins v. Wickland 88 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1958
Collins v. Wickland 88 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1958
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286 .
In Re Petition of Lippmann 81 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1957
In Re Petition of Lippmann 81 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1957
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Johnson v. Agerbeck 77 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1956
Johnson v. Agerbeck 77 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1956
The plaintiffs cite the case of Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286 , as controlling as to the disposition of surface waters.
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. County of Blue Earth 47 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1951
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. County of Blue Earth 47 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1951
For recent application of the rule of the Sheehan case, see Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 27 N. W. (2d) 421 , and Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286 .
Wilcox v. Nelson 35 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1949
Wilcox v. Nelson 35 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1949
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286 ; Village of Minneota v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 226 Minn. 1 , 31 N. W. (2d) 920 .