DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bosell v. Rannestad, 33 N.W.2d 40.

30 citing documents.

  • Lowell v. Plooster v. Julie M. Nelson, and third party v. Mark Plooster, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • Lowell v. Plooster v. Julie M. Nelson, and third party v. Mark Plooster, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    See Bengtson, 310 Minn. at 509, d at 584 (“A public road may be established not only pursuant to Minn. [Stat. §] 160.05 (by user) or Minn. [Stat. §] 164.15 (by statutory dedication), but also by common-law dedication.” (emphasis added)); cf. Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413, 418, (“[Dedication by statutory user] is not exclusive and did not supersede the common-law rule of dedication of a highway to public use.”); Wojahn, 297 d at 306–07 n.4 (“Among the differences between statutory and common
  • State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 684 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
  • State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 684 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
    e land shall be used “for Right of Way and for Railway Purposes.” Courts have long recognized that use of the phrase “right of way” is ambiguous because the phrase may be used to describe either (1) “ ‘a right belonging to a party, a right of passage over any tract’ ” or (2) the physical “ ‘strip of land which railroad companies take upon which to construct their road-bed.’ ” Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413, 418 , -44 (1948) (quoting Joy v. City of St.
  • Bengtson v. Village of Marine on St. Croix 246 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1976
  • Bengtson v. Village of Marine on St. Croix 246 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1976
    Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413
  • Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
  • Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
    Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Mueller v. Drobny, 225 Minn. 338 , 31 N. W. (2d) 40 .
  • Dornberg v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
  • Dornberg v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
    Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Fieve v. Emmeck, 248 Minn. 122 , 78 N. W. (2d) 343 ; Schiro v. Raymond, 237 Minn. 271 , 54 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Norby v. Klukow 81 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1957
  • Norby v. Klukow 81 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1957
    2 Kolatz v. Kelly, 244 Minn. 163, 171 , 69 N. W. (2d) 649, 655 ; Hierl v. McClure, 238 Minn. 335 , 56 N. W. (2d) 721 ; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 .
  • Price v. Grieger 70 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1955
  • Price v. Grieger 70 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1955
    Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; O’Neill v. Minneapolis St.
  • Kolatz v. Kelly 69 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
  • Kolatz v. Kelly 69 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
    Norling v. Stempf, 208 Minn. 143 , ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541, 545 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582, 585 ; Demmer v. Grunke, 230 Minn. 188, 194-195 , 42 N. W. (2d) 1, 6 ; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413, 421 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40, 45 ; Kraus v. Saffert, 208 Minn. 220, 225 , ; see, Johnston v. Jordan, 193 Minn. 298, 300 , .
  • Peterson v. Lang 58 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1953
  • Peterson v. Lang 58 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1953
    5 Cf. Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 .
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
    29; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Marty v. Nordby, 201 Minn. 469 , .
  • Schiro v. Raymond 54 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1952
  • Schiro v. Raymond 54 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1952
    7 See, Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 (to impeach a witness); Physicians & Hospitals Supply Co. v. Johnson, 231 Minn. 548 , 44 N. W. (2d) 224 ; Person v. Bowe, 79 Minn. 238
  • Bellman v. Posnick 46 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1951
  • Bellman v. Posnick 46 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1951
    2 Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N. W. (2d) 883 , has been cited with approval in Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Martin v. Reibel, 227 Minn. 106 , 34 N. W. (2d) 290 ; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Foster v. Bock, 229 Minn. 428 , 39 N. W. (2d) 862 ; Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 ; and Halloran v. Tousignant, 230 Minn. 399 , 41 N. W. (2d) 874 .
  • Halloran v. Tousignant 41 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1950
  • Halloran v. Tousignant 41 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1950
    The rule of the Moore case has been applied in Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Martin v. Reibel, 227 Minn. 106 , 34 N. W. (2d) 290 ; Bosell v. Ran-nestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Foster v. Bock, 229 Minn. 428 , 39 N. W. (2d) 862 ; and Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 .
  • Demmer v. Grunke 42 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1950
  • Demmer v. Grunke 42 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1950
    Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 421 , , 45 ; Kraus v. Saffert, 208 Minn. 220 , 225 , 293 N.W.
  • Rampi v. Vevea 38 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1949
  • Rampi v. Vevea 38 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1949
    Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 82 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 .