Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Mork, 35 N.W.2d 439.

17 citing documents.

In re the Estate of Harry L. Housker, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289, 295
In re: Estate of Loretta M. Chisholm, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An entire change from former testamentary intentions is a strong circumstance to support a charge of undue influence.” In re Olson’s Estate, 227 Minn. 289, 298
In Re the Estate of Opsahl 448 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289, 298, (where a change in a will benefits a party charged with exercising undue influence, the change “is a strong circumstance to support a charge of undue influence.”).
Matter of Estate of Olsen 357 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See also In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289, 297 , -46 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
Schmidt v. Beninga 173 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1970
See, In Re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289, 301 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439, 447 ; Leifson v. Henning, 210 Minn. 311, 313 , ; Guile v. Greenberg, 192 Minn. 548, 556 , .
O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 167 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1969
Both plaintiff and defendant cite as controlling In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289, 297 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439, 445 .
Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
Where, upon the evidence, reasonable minds might differ as to whether undue influence was exercised by the donee, the findings of the court, based upon a jury’s answer to that specific question, may not be disturbed on appeal.” In In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289, 295 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439, 444 , we stated the following rule: “Where the evidence as to testamentary capacity and undue influence is conflicting, findings of the trial court with respect to such questions aré final on appeal, even t
In Re Estate of Anthony 265 Minn. 382 Minn. 1963
[5] In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289, 297 , 35 N.W.
Gaertner v. Rees 107 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1961
See, In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439 ; Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of Wadena, 229 Minn. 263 , 39 N. W. (2d) 164 .
In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
(2d) 765, 773 ; In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289 , 35 N.W.
Vangen v. Nelson 69 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1955
In re Estate of Hartz, 237 Minn. 313 , 54 N. W. (2d) 784 ; In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439 .
State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289 , 35 N.W.
Followed Bystrom v. Palmer 57 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1953
Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N. W. (2d) 828 ; In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Cade v. Hoff 54 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1952
As was appropriately said by this court in In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289, 302 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439 , 447: *324 “The record shows that the parties have explored the factual situation exhaustively and that there is no likelihood of a new trial developing additional evidence.
Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289 , 35 N. W. *370 (2d) 439; In re Estate of Forsythe, 221 Minn. 303 , 22 N. W. (2d) 19 , 167 A. L. R. 1; In re Estate of Jernberg, 153 Minn. 458 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of Wadena 39 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1949
In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439 ; Alexander Pickering & Co. v. Chinese American C. S. Assn. (9 Cir.) 71 F. (2d) 895.
In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948