Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rosenquist v. Baker, 35 N.W.2d 346.

26 citing documents.

TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co., 246 Minn. 1, 10-11 , -12 (1955); Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217, 224
Lobe Enterprises v. Dotsen 360 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lobe Enterprises v. Dotsen 360 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marion v. Miller, 237 Minn. 306, 309 , (quoting Rosenquist *373 v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217, 224 , ).
Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co. 290 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 1980
Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co. 290 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 1980
Because Baxter involved the application of Iowa law, whatever precedential value Baxter may have cannot control over our own decision in Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217
Raach v. Haverly 269 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1978
Raach v. Haverly 269 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1978
See, e. g., Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc., 306 Minn. 194 , Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217
Strouth v. Wilkison 224 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1974
Strouth v. Wilkison 224 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1974
Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217
International Finance Corporation v. Rieger 137 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1965
International Finance Corporation v. Rieger 137 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1965
Freeman v. Fehr, 132 Minn. 384 , ; Gunderson v. Halvorson, 140 Minn. 292 , ; Kremer v. Lewis, 137 Minn. 368 , ; Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217 , 35 N. W. (2d) 346 .
Hockemeyer v. Pooler 130 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1964
Hockemeyer v. Pooler 130 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1964
See, Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217 , 35 N. W. (2d) 346 ; McElrath v. Electric Inv.
Watkins v. Lorenz 119 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1963
Watkins v. Lorenz 119 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1963
Perkins v. Meyerton, 190 Minn. 542 , ; Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217 , 35 N. W. (2d) .
Hafner v. Ritzinger 97 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1959
Hafner v. Ritzinger 97 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1959
In Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217, 222 , 35 N. W. (2d) 346, 349 , we said: “It is well settled that the parol evidence rule is not applicable to exclude evidence of fraudulent oral representations by which one party induces another to enter a written contract, provided the representations were such that the other party might reasonably rely upon them.
Tysk v. Griggs 91 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1958
Tysk v. Griggs 91 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1958
Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 246 Minn. 1 , 74 N. W. (2d) 305 ; Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217 , 35 N. W. (2d) 346 ; 8 Dunnell, Dig.
Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
The rule adopted in this state as the measure of damages in the usual case of deceit is fully stated by this court in Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217 , 35 N. W. (2d) 346 .
Marion v. Miller 55 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1952
Marion v. Miller 55 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1952
The rule which we have adopted as the measure of damages in the usual case is stated in Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217, 224 , 35 N. W. (2d) 346 , 350: “Damages in an action for false representations and deceit are the natural and proximate loss sustained by the party because of reliance thereon.
Dupont v. Haggard 49 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1951
Dupont v. Haggard 49 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1951
See, Rosenquist v. Baker, 227 Minn. 217, 224 , 35 N. W. (2d) 346, 350 ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.