Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Loth v. Loth, 35 N.W.2d 542.

258 citing documents.

Adrianne Robbennolt and obo minor child v. Sandi Weigum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Adrianne Robbennolt and obo minor child v. Sandi Weigum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (stating that “[i]t is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
Melissa Dawn Paisley v. Clark Davis Kratzer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Melissa Dawn Paisley v. Clark Davis Kratzer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, d 542, 546 (1949) (stating that appellate courts cannot assume district court error); (applying Loth).
In the Matter of the Estate of: Rosalie S. Allard, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Estate of: Rosalie S. Allard, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 869 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 869 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, -65 (1944); see Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, 9 (1949) (quoting Waters in a family law appeal); (applying Loth in a family law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
On appeal, error is never presumed: “[i]t must be made to appear affirmatively before there can be reversal” and “the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392
Jeffrey Hugh Boldon v. Brian Perry Boldon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey Hugh Boldon v. Brian Perry Boldon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, At oral argument, appellants’ counsel asserted that appellants were entitled to depreciation schedules that would have demonstrated whether respondents contemporaneously claimed ownership of the equipment and machinery in dispute.
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In conclusion, we remind appellants that error on appeal is never presumed; “[i]t must be made to appear affirmatively before there can be reversal” and “the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The burden of showing error rests upon the party who asserts it, and appellate courts “do not reverse unless there is error causing harm to the appealing party.” Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (quotation omitted); see also Minn. R. Civ.
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Thomas Labarre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Thomas Labarre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed” and that “the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (quotation omitted).
Marie Delores Green v. BMW of North America, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marie Delores Green v. BMW of North America, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (“[W]e do not reverse unless there is error causing harm to the appealing party.
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See 15 Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1 775 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1 775 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392 , (stating that this court cannot assume a district court erred); see also, e.g., C & R Stacy, (treating silence on a motion for amended findings as denial of the motion).
C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of Chisago 742 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of Chisago 742 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(citing Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392 , ).
State v. Jones 647 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Jones 647 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
But “we cannot assume district court error.” In re Paternity of (citing Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392 , ).
Estate of Whish v. Bienfang 622 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Estate of Whish v. Bienfang 622 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 -394, (holding that where funds were deposited into a joint account for purposes of paying $6,715, the remainder was found to be a gift).
Luthen v. Luthen 596 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Luthen v. Luthen 596 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392 , (stating appellate courts cannot assume district court error).
In Re Paternity of BJH 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
A.J.S. v. M.T.H. 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re Paternity of BJH 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392
A.J.S. v. M.T.H. 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392
Zuehlke v. Independent School District No. 316 538 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Zuehlke v. Independent School District No. 316 538 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 399
Hellerstedt v. MacGibbon 489 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hellerstedt v. MacGibbon 489 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392 , (on appeal, error is never presumed).
City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co. 450 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co. 450 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
68 n. 2 (Minn.1979) (citing Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 399 , ).
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387
Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson 357 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by