Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 39 N.W.2d 752.

32 citing documents.

Application of Minnegasco 556 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 556 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., 229 Minn. 312, 330 , (stating that “[i]f the notice of appeal presents to the district court a material issue upon which the commission's findings and order are found to be unreasonable or unlawful, the entire order of the commission must be vacated and set aside”).
In re the Contested Case of Mapleton Community Home, Inc. 373 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re the Contested Case of Mapleton Community Home, Inc. 373 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
It argues that the rate is thus arbitrary, capricious, and confiscatory and that it should not withstand judicial review under State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 229 Minn. 312
St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Public Service Commission 251 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1977
St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Public Service Commission 251 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1977
Co. 229 Minn. 312 , Minneapolis St.
Quinn Distributing Company v. Quast Transfer, Inc. 181 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1970
Quinn Distributing Company v. Quast Transfer, Inc. 181 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1970
Co. 229 Minn. 312, 320 , 39 N. W. [2d] 752, 757), and that determinations of the commission were to be upheld if there was “any evidence” to justify an inference made by the commission (Dahlen Transport, Inc. v. Hahne, 261 Minn. 218, 223 , 112 N. W. [2d] 630, 634).
Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co. 180 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1970
Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co. 180 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1970
Co. 229 Minn. 312, 320 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752, 757 .
Village of Norwood v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 178 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1970
Village of Norwood v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 178 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1970
Co. 229 Minn. 312 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752 ; State v. Chicago & N. W. Ry.
Berg v. City of Minneapolis 143 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1966
Berg v. City of Minneapolis 143 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1966
Co. 229 Minn. 312 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752 ; State ex rel.
City of Minneapolis v. MINNEAPOLIS TRANSIT COMPANY 133 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1965
City of Minneapolis v. MINNEAPOLIS TRANSIT COMPANY 133 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1965
Co. 229 Minn. 312, 319 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752 , 756: “* * * The legislative power of rate making may in no event be exercised by the district court.
Dahlen Transport, Inc. v. Hahne 112 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1961
Dahlen Transport, Inc. v. Hahne 112 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1961
Co. 229 Minn. 312, 320 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752, 757 , we said: “* * * the findings of fact by the commission are in themselves prima facie evidence of the matters therein stated, and such matters so found must be accepted by the district court as established until their prima facie foundation, in the light of the evidence as a whole, is sw
Monson Dray Line, Inc. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 107 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1961
Monson Dray Line, Inc. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 107 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1961
Co. 229 Minn. 312 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752 ; State v. G. N. Ry.
Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 98 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1959
Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 98 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1959
Co. 229 Minn. 312 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752 ; see, also, G. N. Ry.
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Co. 229 Minn. 312, 316 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752, 755; State and Port Authority of St.
State v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 75 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1956
State v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 75 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1956
State v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 75 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1956
Co. 229 Minn. 312, 321 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752, 758 , we said with respect to the function of this court on such appeal: “* * * an appeal therein from a judgment of the district court, vacating such order of the commission as unlawful, unreasonable, and confiscatory, presents to the supreme court the sole issue of whether all the evidence
State v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 75 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1956
Co. 229 Minn. 312 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752; Twin City Motor Bus Co. v. Rechtzigel, 229 Minn. 196 , 38 N. W. (2d) 825 ; Arrowhead Bus Service, Inc. v. Black & White D. C. Co. Inc. 226 Minn. 327 , 32 N. W. (2d) 590 ; State and Port Authority of St.
Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 58 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1953
Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 58 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1953
Co. 229 Minn. 312 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752 .
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Village of Rush City 40 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1950
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Village of Rush City 40 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1950
Co. 229 Minn. 312, 319 , 39 N. W. (2d) 752, 756 , we again said in connection with an appeal from an order of tiie railroad and warehouse commission to the district court: , * * qipg legislative power of rate making may in no event be exercised by the district court.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by