Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. DeZeler, 41 N.W.2d 313.

161 citing documents.

  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
    The standard for the admissibility of photographs was set by this court in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , where we said: Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything for which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description * * * provided they are relevant to some material issue; and they are
  • State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
    (emphasis in original) (quoting State v. De Zeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , ).
  • State v. Olson 459 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Olson 459 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    State v. De Zeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47
  • State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , established the standard for admitting photographs: Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided t
  • State v. Borden 455 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Borden 455 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    -86 (Minn.1982); State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 47
  • State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    -86 (Minn.1982) (citing State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , ).
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    403; State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 40
  • State v. Alton 432 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Alton 432 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1988
    The standard for admission of photographs was set out in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , : *758 Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided they are relevant to some material i
  • State v. Gurske 424 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Gurske 424 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52 , 41 N.W.
  • State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52
  • VanHercke v. Eastvold 405 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • VanHercke v. Eastvold 405 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Moeller v. Hauser, 237 Minn. 368, 384 , (quoting State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , ).
  • State v. Erdman 383 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Erdman 383 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 40
  • State v. Sanders 376 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Sanders 376 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1985
    In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , we stated: Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided they are relevant to some mate
  • State v. Johnson 374 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 374 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52
  • State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
  • Schleret v. State 311 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Berry 309 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Berry 309 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1981
    The photographs defendant challenges accurately portray the scene of the events in question and thus meet the requirements of State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47
  • State v. Gibbons 305 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Gibbons 305 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1981
    See State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52
  • State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52
  • State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
    In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , we stated the rule as follows: Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided they are r
  • State v. Larson 281 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Larson 281 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1979
    See, State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
  • State v. Fossen 282 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Fossen 282 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1979
    In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 49 , this court articulated the standard for determining whether such experimental evidence is admissible: “ * * * The performance of experiments in the presence of the jury, or the admission of evidence of experiments performed out of the presence of the jury, when they are made under cond
  • State v. Carlson 264 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Carlson 264 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1978
    See, also, McNab v. Jeppesen, 258 Minn. 15 , State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
  • State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
    The admission of photographs of a homicide victim’s body is governed by the standard enunciated in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , , 15 A.L.R.2d 1137 (1950).
  • Young v. Wlazik 262 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1977
  • Young v. Wlazik 262 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1977
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
  • State v. Bott 246 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Bott 246 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1976
    In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , , 15 A. L. R. 2d 1137 (1950), we considered a similar challenge to the admissibility of demonstrative evidence, in that case photographs of a corpse.