Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. Utecht, 36 N.W.2d 126.

31 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Carse v. State 778 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Carse v. State 778 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(recognizing right to be present at trial may be waived if done so competently and intelligently); State v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44, 48 , see also Pearson v. United States, 325 F.2d 625, 626-27 (D.C.Cir.1963) (holding that the district court did not err in continuing the trial without defendant when the trial had commenced in defendant’s presence, he vigorously expressed his desire to be absent, he was given ample opport
Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church 679 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church 679 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44, 50 , (holding that the voluntary absence of a criminal defendant from court proceedings amounted to a waiver of his statutory and constitutional rights to be present at the rendition of the verdict).
State v. Calmes 632 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 2001
State v. Calmes 632 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 2001
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44, 54 , in support of his claim that the imposition of a sentence, even in the defendant’s voluntary absence, is unlawful and violates due process.
State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44, 48
State v. Worthy 569 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Worthy 569 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44, 46, 50 , 129-30 (1949) (holding that defendant, who absented self from trial and never returned, had waived right to be present at trial and rendering of verdict; defendant received due process when his attorney represented his interests at trial); 463 (Minn.A
State v. Cassidy 567 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1997
State v. Stout 273 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1978
State v. Stout 273 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1978
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44 , , 6 A.L.R.2d 988 (1949).
State v. Grey 256 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1977
State v. Grey 256 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1977
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44 , , 6 A.L.R.2d 988 (1949), we held that a person charged with a felony is entitled to be present in person at all stages of trial from arraignment to and including the pronouncement of sentence.
State v. Davis 562 P.2d 1370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Jones 247 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1976
State v. Jones 247 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1976
He might at that point in the trial have given more serious consideration to fleeing the jurisdiction of the court, just as did the defendant in State v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44 , and thus the trial court’s order was not an abuse of discretion.
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. Eyman 420 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
City of St. Paul v. Parker 128 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1964
City of St. Paul v. Parker 128 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1964
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44 , 36 N. W. (2d) 126 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 988.
State v. Schifsky 69 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1955
State v. Schifsky 69 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1955
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44 , 36 N. W. (2d) 126 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 988; State v. Gorman, 113 Minn. 401 , , 32 L.R.A.(N.S.)
In re Shetsky 60 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1953
In re Shetsky 60 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1953
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44 , 36 N. W. (2d) 126 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 988.
In re Shetsky for Return of Bail Money 48 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1951
In re Shetsky for Return of Bail Money 48 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1951
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44 , 36 N. W. (2d) 126 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 988.
State v. Shetsky 40 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1949
State v. Shetsky 40 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1949
Shetsky v. Utecht, 228 Minn. 44 , 36 N. W. [2d] 126, 6 A. L. R. [2d] 988), he was again sentenced to life imprisonment.