Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. Birkeland, 38 N.W.2d 215.

46 citing documents.

Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKES 784 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKES 784 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 86 , (stating that Minn. Stat. § 508.25 "specifically provides that all rights in public highways upon the land shall remain unimpaired by Torrens registration proceedings”).
Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes 744 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2008
Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes 744 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2008
§ 508.25(4) (2006); see Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 86 , ("Section 508.25(4) specifically provides that all rights in public highways upon the land shall remain unimpaired by Torrens registration proceedings.”).
Bolen v. Glass 737 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bolen v. Glass 737 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
229 Minn. 77, 80-84 , -20 (1949).
In Re the Request of Lafayette Development Corp. 567 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Request of Lafayette Development Corp. 567 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Flynn v. Beisel, 257 Minn. 531, 541 , (establishing public use under common-law dedication); Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 82 , (establishing public use under statutory dedication and common-law dedication); (establishing public road under common-law dedication).
Foster v. Bergstrom 515 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Foster v. Bergstrom 515 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Use may be by a comparatively small number of persons and still be “public use.” Anderson, v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 82
Reider v. City of Spring Lake Park 480 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Reider v. City of Spring Lake Park 480 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 79 , (no new trial required where jury found that road had been dedicated for public use without stating upon which theory its finding had been based).
Sackett v. Storm 480 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Sackett v. Storm 480 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 83
Town of Wahnena v. Dorholt 465 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Town of Wahnena v. Dorholt 465 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 82
Town of Belle Prairie v. Kliber 448 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Town of Belle Prairie v. Kliber 448 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 80 , ).
Township of Villard v. Hoting 442 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Township of Villard v. Hoting 442 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
*829 See Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 83-84 , see also Bengtson, 310 Minn, at 509, d at 584 .
Henley v. County of Chisago 370 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Henley v. County of Chisago 370 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bengtson , 310 Minn, at 509, d at 584 ; Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 84
Northfork Township v. Joffer 353 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northfork Township v. Joffer 353 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
at 146 , d at 767-68 ; Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 82
Ravenna Township v. Grunseth 314 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1981
Ravenna Township v. Grunseth 314 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1981
Similarly, in Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77 , a jury verdict of statutory user was upheld where the road had been graveled, resurfaced and oiled, and guard posts had been installed within a period of 4 or 5 years.
Shinneman v. Arago Township 288 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1980
Shinneman v. Arago Township 288 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1980
Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 80
Quist v. Fuller 220 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1974
Quist v. Fuller 220 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1974
However, this court has found that it is “the right of travel by all the world, and not the exercise of the right, which constitutes a road a public highway.” Anderson v. Birkeland, *372 229 Minn. 77, 82 , Trebnick v. Gordon, 259 Minn. 164
Moritz v. Town of Burns 193 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1972
Moritz v. Town of Burns 193 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1972
Leeper v. Hampton Hills, Inc. 290 Minn. 143 , Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77
Leeper v. Hampton Hills, Inc. 187 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1971
Leeper v. Hampton Hills, Inc. 187 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1971
Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77 , 38 N. W. (2d) 215 .
County of Hennepin v. Shasky 182 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1970
County of Hennepin v. Shasky 182 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1970
Anderson v. Birkeland (1949), , 229 Minn. 77 .” The first two sentences of the requested instruction appear to ask the court to assume the existence of facts on an issue not before the court and not a matter of judicial notice.
Trebnick v. Gordon 106 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1960
Trebnick v. Gordon 106 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1960
Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77 , 38 N. W. (2d) 215 .
LaBelle v. Swanson 78 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1956
LaBelle v. Swanson 78 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1956
Co. 223 Minn. 580 , 27 N. W. (2d) 806 ; Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77 , 38 N. W. (2d) 215 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
Schroht v. Voll 71 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1955
Schroht v. Voll 71 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1955
Co. 223 Minn. 580, 585 , 27 N. W. (2d) 806, 809; Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77 , 38 N. W. (2d) 215 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Fischer 71 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1955
State v. Fischer 71 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1955
Boye v. City of Albert Lea, 93 Minn. 121, 123 , ; Carpenter v. Gantzer, 164 Minn. 105, 109 , ; Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77, 83 , 38 N. W. (2d) 215, 219 .
Daugherty v. Sowers 68 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1955
Daugherty v. Sowers 68 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1955
3 Anderson v. Birkeland, 229 Minn. 77 , 82 to 84, 38 N. W. (2d) 215 , 219 to 220; 1 Elliott, Roads and Streets (4 ed.) § 140.