DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Barrett v. Nash Finch Co., 36 N.W.2d 526.

35 citing documents.

  • State v. Peterson 463 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Peterson 463 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    See Barrett v. Nash Finch Co., 228 Minn. 156, 161
  • Hafner v. Iverson 343 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1984
  • Hafner v. Iverson 343 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1984
    Accord Barrett v. Nash Finch Co., *638 228 Minn. 156
  • Rieger v. Zackoski 321 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1982
  • Shafer Ex Rel. Shafer v. Gaylord 176 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1970
  • Shafer Ex Rel. Shafer v. Gaylord 176 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1970
    Co. 108 Minn. 100 , ; Robinson v. Butler, 226 Minn. 491 , 33 N. W. (2d) 821 , 4 A. L. R. (2d) 143; Sanders v. Gilbertson, 224 Minn. 546 , 29 N. W. (2d) 357 ; Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Tandeski v. Barnard, 265 Minn. 339 , 121 N. W. (2d) 708 ; 13B Dunriell, Dig.
  • Jorgensen v. Hawton 161 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1968
  • Jorgensen v. Hawton 161 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1968
    Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 .
  • Cahill v. Peterson 151 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1967
  • Cahill v. Peterson 151 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1967
    Barclay v. O’Dell, 266 Minn. 393 , 123 N. W. (2d) 681 ; Sims v. Hallett Const. Co. 247 Minn. 339 , 77 N. W. (2d) 54 ; Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Seward v. Minneapolis St.
  • Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
  • Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
    Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Seward v. Minneapolis St.
  • Barclay v. O'DELL 123 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1963
  • Barclay v. O'DELL 123 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1963
    11 Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156, 161 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526, 529 ; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352, 360 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788, 792 .
  • Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
  • Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
    Plaintiff cites Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N. W. (2d) 883 , 175 A. L. R. 1007; and Paggett v. Travelers Ind.
  • Ondrachek v. Kettner 98 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1959
  • Ondrachek v. Kettner 98 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1959
    Thus, in Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156, 160 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526, 529 , we said: “* * * Where the driver of an automobile plainly sees another automobile upon the highway in time to avoid a collision and negligently fails to do so, the driver’s negligence is an intervening, efficient, and the proximate cause of the collision, insulating the prior negligence
  • Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. 96 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1959
  • Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. 96 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1959
    13 See, Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 ; 13 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
  • Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
    5 See, Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156, 160 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526, 529 , wherein we said: “* * * where the driver of an automobile plainly sees another automobile upon the highway in time to avoid a collision and negligently fails to do so, the driver’s negligence is an intervening, efficient, and the proximate cause of the collision, insulating the prior ne
  • Sims v. Hallett Construction Co. 77 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1956
  • Sims v. Hallett Construction Co. 77 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1956
    Where a second actor has become aware of the existence of a potential danger created by the negligence of an original tortfeasor, and thereafter, by an independent act of negligence, brings about an accident, the first tort-feasor is relieved of liability, because the condition created by him was merely a circumstance of the accident and not its proximate cause.” And in Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156, 160 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526, 529 , we said: *344 “* * * Where the driver of an automobile
  • Kedrowski v. Czech 69 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1955
  • Kedrowski v. Czech 69 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1955
    The plaintiff in the case at bar cites the case of Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 , in connection with the assertion that whether he should or should not have stopped as he did was a question for the jury and that, even if he was negligent in this risk, his negligence ceased to be a proximate cause having been reduced to a condition only by virtue of the lapse of time.
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
    Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Medved v. Doolittle, 220 Minn. 352 , 19 N. W. (2d) 788 ; Geisen v. Luce, 185 Minn. 479 , ; and Denson v. McDonald, 144 Minn. 252 , , cases in which the negligence of an oncoming driver was held to constitute an intervening cause sufficient to insulate the negligence of t
  • Bielinski v. Colwell 65 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1954
  • Bielinski v. Colwell 65 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1954
    § 169.96; Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Rue v. Wendland, 226 Minn. 449 , 33 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Flitton v. Daleki, 216 Minn. 549 , 13 N. W. (2d) 477 ; Wojtowicz v. Belden, 211 Minn. 461 , 1 N. W. (2d) 409 .
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
    Cf. Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 .
  • Howard v. Marchildon 37 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1949
  • Howard v. Marchildon 37 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1949
    Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 228 Minn. 156 , 36 N. W. (2d) 526 .