Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berghuis v. Korthuis, 37 N.W.2d 809.

31 citing documents.

Dametria White, et al., as co-trustees for the next-of-kin of Helayne Bass, deceased, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
at 122 (quotation marks omitted); (“This period fixing the time within which the right of action for wrongful death may be exercised is not an ordinary statute of limitations.
Dennis J. Daulton, trustee for the next of kin of Brady Joel Daulton v. TMS Treatment Center, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dennis J. Daulton, trustee for the next of kin of Brady Joel Daulton v. TMS Treatment Center, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1, within the specified three-year statute of limitations a “condition precedent to the right to maintain the action.” (explaining that a wrongful-death action is “purely statutory”).
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Accordingly, the three-year statute of limitations provided in Minnesota’s wrongful-death statute, Minn. Stat. § 573.02, is “jurisdictional, requiring dismissal for failure to comply” and does “not have flexible parameters permitting [it] to be ignored if [its] application is too technical.” Ortiz, d at 122 (quotation omitted); see also Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534, 536, (“This period fixing the time within which the right of action for authority.” Kontrick v. Ryan, 540 U.S. 443, 455, 124
Whitener Ex Rel. Miller v. Dahl 625 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 2001
Whitener Ex Rel. Miller v. Dahl 625 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 2001
at 122 (quoting Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534, 536 , ).
Whitener v. Dahl 612 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Whitener v. Dahl 612 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Ortiz, d at 122 (wrongful-death statute of limitations “ ‘conditions the right’ ”) (quoting Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534, 536 , ); Cashman, 215 Minn. at 467 , d at 391 (wrongful-death action created by statute that is “condition affecting the right rather than the remedy”).
Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Gavenda 590 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1999
Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Gavenda 590 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1999
Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534, 536 , see also Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc., d, 138, 141 (Minn.1984); Cashman, 215 Minn. at 469 , d at 391-92 .
Bliss v. Stevens 544 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bliss v. Stevens 544 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cf. McBride, d at 561 (holding sheriff of county, where plaintiff believed defendant resided, to be “proper officer” for service); Berghuis v. Korihuis, 228 Minn. 534, 536-37 , (interpreting and applying Minn.Stat.
Erickson v. Coast Catamaran Corp. 414 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1987
Erickson v. Coast Catamaran Corp. 414 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1987
See, Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534
Nachtsheim v. Wartnick 411 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nachtsheim v. Wartnick 411 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534, 536
Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. Jensen 399 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1987
Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. Jensen 399 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1987
See also Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534, 536 , Cashman v. Hedberg, 215 Minn. 463, 472
Krause v. Kim 379 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Krause v. Kim 379 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534
Tiedeken v. Tiedeken 363 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Tiedeken v. Tiedeken 363 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
See, e.g., Witthuhn v. Durbahn, 279 Minn. 437 , (strict construction of 2-year limitation); Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534 , (meeting requirements of limitation period is a condition precedent to bringing suit); Cashman v. Hedberg, 215 Minn. 463 , (limitation period is a condition precedent to wrongful death suit); Rugland v. Anderson, 30 Minn. 386 , 15 N.W.
DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. 319 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1982
DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. 319 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1982
See, e.g., Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534 , Cashman v. Hedberg, 215 Minn. 463 , Rugland v. Anderson, 30 Minn. 386 , 15 N.W.
McBride v. Bitner 310 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1981
McBride v. Bitner 310 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1981
See Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534
Viiliainen v. American Finnish Workers Society 53 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1952
Viiliainen v. American Finnish Workers Society 53 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1952
3 Berghuis v. Korthuis, 228 Minn. 534 , 37 N. W. (2d) 809 ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.